Not sure to be honest, just posted what was on the paper.Originally Posted by Jock MIB
Quick Question, how did St Pats lose two points they only gained one point from the Prospect game, so if prospect got the three points ST PATS should only have been deducted one point.Croom...Pl 20 / Pts 46 (Max 52)....PROMOTED AS CHAMPIONS
Prospect...Pl 20 / Pts 39 (Max 45)
Park........Pl 21 / Pts 38 (Max 41)
Fairview...Pl 21 / Pts 37 (Max 40)
Coonagh...Pl 20 / Pts 34 (Max 40)
Shels.......Pl 20 / Pts 30 (Max 36)
Knockainey...Pl 19 / Pts 25 (Max 34)
Murroe.....Pl 19 / Pts 24 (Max 33)
Pike B.......Pl 20 / Pts 18 (Max 24)
Holycross...Pl 19 / Pts 18 (Max 27)
St.Pats....Pl 19 / Pts 16 (Max 25)
Abbey.......Pl 20 / Pts 11 (Max 17)
Not sure to be honest, just posted what was on the paper.
Croom...Pl 20 / Pts 46 (Max 52)...........PROMOTED AS CHAMPIONS
Prospect...Pl 20 / Pts 39 (Max 45)
Park........Pl 21 / Pts 38 (Max 41)
Fairview...Pl 22 / Pts 37 (Max 37)
Coonagh...Pl 21 / Pts 37 (Max 40)
Shels.......Pl 20 / Pts 30 (Max 36)
Knockainey...Pl 19 / Pts 25 (Max 34)
Murroe.....Pl 19 / Pts 24 (Max 33)
Holycross...Pl 20 / Pts 21 (Max 27)
Pike B.......Pl 20 / Pts 18 (Max 24)
St.Pats....Pl 20 / Pts 16 (Max 22)
Abbey.......Pl 20 / Pts 11 (Max 17)........RELEGATED
Tuesday 13/05/08 (18.45)
Fairview 0-1 Holycross
Coonagh 5-2 St.Pats
Pike v Abbey (No Result Yet)
Thursday 16/05/08 (18.45)
Croom v Prospect
Knockainey v Murroe
Sunday 18/05/08 (10.30)
Holycross v Prospect
Remaining games: HOME GAMES IN CAPS
(2) Croom : COONAGH, PROSPECT,
(2) Prospect : croom, holycross
(1) Park : murroe
(1) Coonagh : croom,
(1) Shels : knockainey
(3) Knockainey : MURROE, SHELS, abbey,
(2) Holycross : PROSPECT, murroe
(3) Murroe : PARK, HOLYCROSS, knockainey
(2) St Pats : PIKE,
(2) Pike : ABBEY, st.pats
(2) Abbey : KNOCKAINEY, pike,
Last edited by abbeyvale; 14/05/2008 at 7:41 AM.
According to Pats last night,they are on 18 points, have not played an illegal player and have not been told they have lost a point.
good news for Pike B then................should be a cracker when they meet
St Patricks v Fairview Rgs B 2- 1
Murroe v St Patricks 0-0
Pike Rvs B v St Patricks 2-1
St Patricks v Park AFC 0-1
Croom Utd v St Patricks 9-2
St Patricks v FView A 1-1
St Patricks v Holycross 1-1
Pallasgreen v St Patricks 4-3
Abbey Rvs v St Patricks 3-6
St Patricks v Coonagh Utd 2-3
St Patricks v Shelbourne 1-1
St Pauls v St Patricks 1-4
Fairview Rgs B v St Patricks 2-2
Knockainey v St Patricks 4-3
Prospect Priory v St Patricks 6-0
St Patricks v Knockainey 1-4
St Patricks v Abbey Rvs 4-1
St Patricks v Holycross 1-6
St Patricks v Croom Utd 1-2
St Patricks v Prospect Priory Awarded
St Patricks v Murroe 1-2
Coonagh Utd v St Patricks 5-2
Holycross v St Patricks 1-2
Park AFC v St Patricks 1-0
Equals Played 20 Points 16
Why would you bother????
"Joe Jordan is off to watch Young Boys tomorrow" Ian Darke
Why was this awarded? Pats lads last night were absolutely certain no illegal players played again Prospect. It was all B and C team players.
18 times, and that's a fact.
dont know reason - just that LDMC found in favour of Prospect objection
good result for Holycross, far from safe yet though
LTID
was shane hanlon of jansboro playing for ye holycross, against abbey the other night as i tought he was playing for boro,bgood result for Holycross, far from safe yet though
Yeah...they really really really need to beat Prospect to be sure of staying up.good result for Holycross, far from safe yet though
18 times, and that's a fact.
Trust a coonagh man to try and get the Cross to beat Prospect...!! Give it up....Done deal..Yeah...they really really really need to beat Prospect to be sure of staying up.
Ps it makes no sense that St Pats have been deucted 2 points from a drawn game....something majorly wrong...could be anarchy here as its so tight !!!
Lol...well we have to ask.
St.Pats thing seems very strange alright. As far as the players are aware they werent even informed about the objection and werent invited in to Jackman which is the case with every objection.
And if you look at Barryks list of results for them above there are cup games included in that list. Three results are against Holycross so which ones were in the league. The fact remains that they had 18 points last week and if the LDMC took 1 point for a draw from them they should still have 17. It just stinks and someones after making a balls of it.
Are you with St.Pats Barryk?
18 times, and that's a fact.
the 6-1 score line was a cup game , the pallasgreen, St Pauls and the Fairview A was a cup game. so all in all it adds up to 16 points. So maybe the league tables have been wrong all along and St Pats should have been on 17 points before the deduction and not 18 pointsLol...well we have to ask.
St.Pats thing seems very strange alright. As far as the players are aware they werent even informed about the objection and werent invited in to Jackman which is the case with every objection.
And if you look at Barryks list of results for them above there are cup games included in that list. Three results are against Holycross so which ones were in the league. The fact remains that they had 18 points last week and if the LDMC took 1 point for a draw from them they should still have 17. It just stinks and someones after making a balls of it.
Are you with St.Pats Barryk?
Well that explains the 16 points anyway.
Now who can explain what the objection was about?
18 times, and that's a fact.
Guess who's back......................
No clue what the objection was about but in all the post on here and from the paper I maintain that St. Pats have played 20 and have 16 points. They have Shels and Pike left to play and must win both. A point will now do Pike when we travel to Patrickswell for our last game. But that is not 100percent. Ldmc are only ones who know for certain.
Thats fantatic. As i said ,Pats said last night they had 18 points.
Yeah think there is a mistake with Coonaghs points alsothe 6-1 score line was a cup game , the pallasgreen, St Pauls and the Fairview A was a cup game. so all in all it adds up to 16 points. So maybe the league tables have been wrong all along and St Pats should have been on 17 points before the deduction and not 18 points
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks