Been away on holidays for the last week or so hence the late reply.
The major flaw with your counter argument here is that you aren't actually listening to what I've said and are assuming I'm claiming things that I'm not.
Let's dress this post down fully shall we?
Right, let's have a look at what I was actually claiming here.
From that link I provided in my last post, you can check these if you don't take my word for it.
1st Division 2006
Club Average attendance
Galway United 1,148
Shamrock Rovers 1,089
Dundalk FC 1,078
Finn Harps 428
Athlone 421
Cobh Ramblers 368
Limerick 364
Kildare County 265
Monaghan Utd 204
Kilkenny City 122
Average 570, but when you take away the top 3, 310.
1st Division 2005
Club Average attendance
Sligo Rovers 1,819
Limerick 669
Galway United 566
Dundalk 474
Cobh Ramblers 403
Athlone 316
Kildare County 186
Kilkenny City 185
Monaghan United 183
Dublin City 175
Average 523, but when you take away the top 3, 274.
1st Division 2004
Club Average attendance
Finn Harps 1,106
Bray Wanderers 818
Sligo Rovers 781
Dundalk 591
Galway United 571
UCD 306
Kildare 298
Athlone 291
Cobh Ramblers 240
Limerick 188
Monaghan United 182
Kilkenny City 108
Average 515, but when you take away the top 3, 352.
Right, now, the reason I've taken away the top 3 in each of these cases is because in general there are 3 clubs with significantly higher attendances than the others. 2005 being something of an exception, but then even still if you only took out Sligo (who had far higher attendances than the rest) the average would still likely only be around 320 or so.
Additionally, let's not discount the impact that the large away followings of clubs like Sligo have on other clubs' attendances. My aim here is to try and establish the real level of support/interest for both levels of football.
Your counter-argument was focussed on a lot of stuff I wasn't even claiming and using figures from a season (this one) that is both not complete and therefore inaccurate, and also completely atypical in that the invitational thingy you've got in your Premier Division has shuffled a lot of teams around, some of whom, like Shelbourne, have enjoyed plenty of success in recent times so will therefore naturally have higher than average gates for their level of football. Also, there are some newly-formed clubs like Wexford whose gates will likely become more 'par for the course' over the next few years as the novelty factor wears off.
I personally think that general stats over the course of several years are a better way of measuring actual levels of support for a certain standard of football, and indeed that is why I wasn't claiming any of the things you implied I was, most likely because you are so arrogant that you can't even accept that the tiny little Welsh Premier could even come near the might of the Eircom 1st Division.
When you reply to this, reply to it on its own merits and not on stuff that I'm not claiming to be true as you did with the last one.
Bookmarks