Not having a go at the player or the club here, so here I go.
A lot of people on this board would be of the opinion that the Scottish League is Brutal apart from from the Old Firm (sometimes even them) and that the top Eircom League teams could easily compete, and easily compete below the Championship.
No my point is that a player who has been a failure at a supposedly worse team (falkirk) is been seen as an improvement to one of the best teams in the league, as far as i could see nobody else was in for him so would his progress in the league be seen possibly as a litmus test for players going over and back?
Bobby Ryan , Noel Hunt to name two off the top of my head have been relative failures going over after being top players in the loi
What does this say about the standard of the League?
Bookmarks