Really?
So that had nothing to do with Bohs?there have been other occasions where rovers have rampaged far away from football stadiums (Hill 16 Pub anyone)
That's not the case at all.and here they are on here spinning this to make it sound like Bohs toerags have suddenly decided that they dont like Rovers and have invented a new type of hooligan activity to target anyone in a rover's shirt and anyone who gets between them and anyone in a rovers shirt.
I quoted the part of your post that I responded to. Why would I quote the whole post if I'm not responding to all of it?
4th paragraph, first sentence. You've said (indirectly) that Rovers fans got what was coming to them in relation to this incident. Didn't seem to bother you that innocent people got injured. No point in saying you don't condone innocent people getting hurt but condoning the Rovers fans getting injured when innocent people were hurt to injure them.To answer your post in full - of course i get the point of this and it is sickening. Of course no innocent bystanders should be subjected to this. Where have i suggested otherwise?
Well it's not hypothetical because it's happening all the time.The second part of your post is hypothetical and pointless.
Pointless? Only if you don't have a problem with ongoing violence surrounding football in this league.
20 on 1 accepting the challenge? Bricking buses accepting the challenge?then crying when these absolute scumbags accept the Rovers challenge. Its a bit cheeky to say the least.
Do you actually think that hasn't been done?![]()
Bookmarks