It's all to play for...

[paul_oshea]

I understand your logic that slovakia mite not be up for it against us if they lose tonite, but at the same time the czechs still have to play them also so i think whatever form theyre in against us they will be the same against the czechs (good or bad).

So I'm supporting the slovakians tonite cos i believe if they win two places are up for grabs instead of one. especially as germany aren't great by any stretch

this is exactly what i was getting to in a previous post. It means the slovaks will be as up for it against the czechs as us, plus it means if we beat germany in croker we are even on points with them ( assuming we get the same points as they do until then.....)

Just goes to show what a poor quality group it is (apart from Germany), given that we're still in with a chance after the sh!te that we've played...

again i made this point earlier, its all relative, to who has played who and where and at what stage in the qualifiers.....it was always going to be like this even when we lost to cyprus. its funny how people see things.

[Bungle]

I don't agree with hoping germany hammer slovakia tonite. I believe its much better to have the possibility of getting one of two places rather than germany running away with the group. If germany did lose tonite (but i dont think they will) we would still be within touching distance of them also.

I understand your logic that slovakia mite not be up for it against us if they lose tonite, but at the same time the czechs still have to play them also so i think whatever form theyre in against us they will be the same against the czechs (good or bad).

So I'm supporting the slovakians tonite cos i believe if they win two places are up for grabs instead of one. especially as germany aren't great by any stretch

I can see your logic but the thing is the Germans are in pole position. They've got the points and the goal difference. Far better in my opinion, for them to beat the Slovaks and reduce their morale for Bratislava. The Slovaks view the game against the Czechs as a major rivalry so they'll be up for it, regardless of their situation. Wouldn't it be great, if the Germans came to Dublin already qualified and testing out players to give them the experience of playing in a difficult environment.

Another thing is the Slovaks are a major rival of ours to be third seeds for the next world cup. It's absolutely crucial that we get out of being fourth seeds.

[youngirish]

its not a good value bet as we are not going to win it. So it could be 2000/1.

History shows that any sh*te can win the Euros once they qualify so to say we might qualify but can't win it is nonsense. As I said I really don't think we'll win it (if being honest I think we'll struggle to qualify) but we defo have a better than 150/1 chance to win it. Betting is all about getting the odds. I wouldn't consider backing us at 25/1 for example (or even 50 /1 for that matter).

If we qualify and get some good results on the way our odds will go way down.

[beautifulrock]

Another thing is the Slovaks are a major rival of ours to be third seeds for the next world cup. It's absolutely crucial that we get out of being fourth seeds.

This is the least we should expect bearing in mind how well results have gone for us in this group. Forget about catching Germany we are not going to do it. It is crucial for us that they win all their remaining games, except of course, the one against us.

[NeilMcD]

Betting is about winning the money. If you lose it matters little what odds you got.

[lionelhutz]

I can see your logic but the thing is the Germans are in pole position. They've got the points and the goal difference. Far better in my opinion, for them to beat the Slovaks and reduce their morale for Bratislava. The Slovaks view the game against the Czechs as a major rivalry so they'll be up for it, regardless of their situation. Wouldn't it be great, if the Germans came to Dublin already qualified and testing out players to give them the experience of playing in a difficult environment.

Another thing is the Slovaks are a major rival of ours to be third seeds for the next world cup. It's absolutely crucial that we get out of being fourth seeds.

Wouldn't it be even better if Germany came to Dublin 3 points ahead of us and we turned them over 2-0 to have a better head to head record and then we'd be ahead of them!! I know thats very optimistic but nothing is impossible!!

I know the Slovaks would be well up for it against the Czechs no matter what, but I think the Slovaks would be much more motivated if they still had a chance of qualifying.

And I think we should be setting our standards higher than looking for a good seeding come the next qualifying campaign. Whether third of fourth seeding, I don't believe it makes much of a difference anyway. Weren't we top seeds for the 2004 qualifiers and where did we end up? It all depends on the players you have at that time

[gufcfan]

Can we get that match here? Wouldn't mind tuning into it?

[Danny]

its on a good few stations according to this link

http://liveonsat.com/

some pubs might have it.

[KildareRed]

Our away form is shocking though. How can people think we can turn the past few away performances around. I like, everyone else would love to see us get 6 or 4 points away to Slovakia and Czech Rep but realistacally in my view I cant see us doing so.

[youngirish]

Betting is about winning the money. If you lose it matters little what odds you got.

Agreed but if you see a price that represents good odds then you should take it. Over time if you are clever enough to pick up the odds that look to represent a better return on the actual probability of the team/horse (whatever) winning then you'll win more than you lose. That's simple mathematics. It all depends how often you bet.

Remember the prices quoted by the bookies at the end of the day are in a large part set by the punter so you can get good odds if you look. That explains why England are always ridiculously low odds to win tournaments in English bookies because the mongos over here that don't have a clue about football always get the cash out for them in the World Cup and Euros thereby driving the prices low.

[Noelys Guitar]

Stan should treat the next 2 competitive games as a mini tournament. Try win both and have all squad players ready to play and not just 13 or 14. I don't care how we do against Denmark. Just gear everything towads winning those 2 games and then see how many points we can pick up. If we are ahead of the Czechs come Sept 13 then job well done.

[Sligo Hornet]

History shows that any sh*te can win the Euros once they qualify so to say we might qualify but can't win it is nonsense. As I said I really don't think we'll win it (if being honest I think we'll struggle to qualify) but we defo have a better than 150/1 chance to win it. Betting is all about getting the odds. I wouldn't consider backing us at 25/1 for example (or even 50 /1 for that matter).

If we qualify and get some good results on the way our odds will go way down.

Apart from Greece ( and at a push, Denmark )..where's the Sh*te?

[youngirish]

Apart from Greece ( and at a push, Denmark )..where's the Sh*te?

Greece and Denmark (who weren't even good enough to qualify properly) that's two winners out of the last 4 that were at best average. Is that not enough for you?

[bennocelt]

Agreed but if you see a price that represents good odds then you should take it. Over time if you are clever enough to pick up the odds that look to represent a better return on the actual probability of the team/horse (whatever) winning then you'll win more than you lose. That's simple mathematics. It all depends how often you bet.
.

the reason ireland are 150/1 to win is cause they have a one in 150 chance of qualifying, ie......no chance

Im sorry but thats not worth a bet considering ireland probably wont even get into the European Champs,

As someone said already........Croatia look good at 25/1
no idea myself though, but def not ireland

[lionelhutz]

Greece and Denmark (who weren't even good enough to qualify properly) that's two winners out of the last 4 that were at best average. Is that not enough for you?

I wouldn't exactly rate that Denmark team as Sh**e - not with the two Laudrups, Jensen who went to Arsenal, Henrik Larsen, Scmeichel........ Not bad if you ask me

[Stuttgart88]

a static bet makes no sense to me, but maybe some form of spread bet if it's available e.,g. you earn 0 points if we fail to qualify, 10 points if we qualify but get eliminated in group stages, 25 pts if eliminated in last 8, 50 last 4, 75 r/up, 100 winner.

Where to make the market is the question. 3.5 pts /1.5pts anyone?

If you're a bear you'd get 1.5 times your stake if we fail to qualify: great odds in one sense, but you have the downside of losing 8.5 times your stake minimum, maybe more if the unlikely happens.

If you're a bull you're out of pocket 3 and bit times your stake if we fail to qualify but your downside is capped at this and then you have the upside, 3/1 or better to qualify.

Any more experienced betters than me here care to comment? Any traders or bookies?

Maybe a betfair job that means you could cash in, say if our odds fall from 150/1 to 100/1, if we have a good September?

[paul_oshea]

i reckon we have to be a little more realistic and i think this is;
2 draws, a win against cyprus and a win against either czech or slovakia leaves us with a very good chance in our last game against wales, meaning that we may not need a win, therefore taking pressure off us and just going to play, which when we do that we usually play well. We could win that game and end up with 11 points, that leaves us on 24 which really is all we can ask for, if we dont qualify after that then so be it but at least we will really have given it an almighty shot.

[beautifulrock]

I wouldn't exactly rate that Denmark team as Sh**e - not with the two Laudrups, Jensen who went to Arsenal, Henrik Larsen, Scmeichel........ Not bad if you ask me

Yes indeed they did, but remember they did not even qualify. A well organised team who are confident of their ability and have a good run with injuries can always hope to do well. Can Ireland win in 2008, well if Greece can win it why not us.

[bwagner]

Guys on the seeding...Whats the best and worse seeding we can end up on ??

[youngirish]

Best is 2nd if we win all our remaining games I think (also depends on other results). Realistically 3rd or 4th. 3rd at present looks most likely. Correct me if I'm wrong about the 2nd though.