ye were only missing 2 so cause the rest of em started.
alan barry obviously, dom fitz, hoola went off injured after 5 minutes, danny hanley very short of match fitness, nicky carroll struggling after about tens mins, ado fitsimons finished the game hobblingOriginally Posted by the hoops
ye were only missing 2 so cause the rest of em started.
Wasnt Dom a sub yesterday?
just for the record young boy im not a boro man. my point was without trying to take too much away from balla part of the reason they were so dominant in the second half was cos the boro players on the field were carrying injuries and three of their best players played a maximum of 5 minutes between them. take 3 key players out of the balla team, or any team in town for that matter then have another 3 playing through injuries and see how they get on
well ken Mc was injured after a half hour and hobbled around for 20 mins before going off james ryan didn't start, shane o'connell and alan johnson were injured jamie o'sullivan was ineligable there's 5
isint that why boro beat pike in the semi?pike missing purcell mc,garry and so on balla beat ye get over it
Robert Earls suspended is another.
lads relax, all i said was boro had a few injuries, i also said that balla were the better side and fully deserved their win
will you stop, boro with 10 men for 70 mins and missing a few of their own and dont be telling me to get over anything if you read my posts properly you might see i have nothing to get over
have to laugh at this one.isnt that why boro beat pike?pike might have missed purcell and mc garry but were boro not missing alan barry,danny hanley,houla and sherlock in the same game?i was told both teams were missing 3 or 4 that day and hardly had a sub between them.regardding the tuohy final as i watched it balla were the stronger in the 2nd half used the wind much more to there advantage and put there subs on at crucial times.they deserved to win the game.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks