Ah we're back to the ol' aul/msl debate again!! Personally, and again the game is all about opinions, the top 4 in aul are nowhere near the top 4 in msl. I agree, that no team would steamroll eachother, but 7/8 times out of ten the likes of avondale and everton would beat grattan and they're the best the aul have to offer. The likes of everton and avondale have excellent quality players, better teams than top aul sides. A more appropriate comparison should be made between the likes of grattan, bphehane kinsale and co to carrigaline, mayfield and corinthians. That's realistically the level grattan are at on their good days.
Before anyone asks im not pro msl and anti aul, im just giving an honest opinion. In the last 7 years ive played(and subbed more often that not!!) 4 years msl and 3 aul. In that time ive played in an aoh cup final (where the standard of opposition was poor) and lost an msl league on the last day of the season. So I suppose im in a better position than most to assess the standard in both leagues and offer a fair comparison. One mightnt realise it until they're actually playing msl, but the tempo and speed of the game is quicker.
I agree with ye that the last 16 fai junior is def as good as the last 16 intermediate cup, but when was the last time 3/4 teams from the aul made it into the last 16 of the fai junior in the same season. I personally cant recall! Every year u have at least 3-6 msl teams in last 16 of fai intermediate cup (although to be honest there are less rounds than fai junior)
Bookmarks