Doyle has been applauded by all commentators this season. Bendtner has been derided by most, including his own fans.
I'm an Arsenal fan and I can see Bendtner has some merits - his hold up play is decent for example - but at times he has been totally and utterly hapless. I mean real rubbish. Despite scoring a good goal against Liverpool in the Carling Cup QF(?) he was a laibility all night, finding Liverpool players with short passes all the time. Likewise against Burnley this year when he was laughed off the pitch. Same against Villa last season. He gets a few goals but I reckon most forwards would score goals for Arsenal. He does seem to play better for Denmark though.
Paul O'S (long time mate..): 2 headers in the Barcelona tie summed up Bendtner for me: a gilt-edged chance in the home leg when it was set up perfectly for him. When easier to score he headed it straight at Valdez. In the away game a great cross came in from the left and he still contrived to hit the post, only to be reprieved by an offside flag. His goal in Barcelona showed good tenacity (and agility as you say) but he should probably have stuck the first chance away. He scored a similarly tenacious goal against Porto. But he just needs so many chances to score.
For me Doyle is better at leading the line, better at heading the ball despite being shorter, and better, or at least more consistent, as an all round footballer. Even if there was nothing in it, Doyle's attitude and application is better. I reckon Bendtner may be a better athlete but Doyle is a smarter player - I've always felt he's like Larsson in all respects.
The new guy Chamakh from Bordeaux looks very strong in the air, despite not being huge.
Bookmarks