QuoteSo the rules are superseded by the speculation of what may or may not have happened? Glad that's cleared up.
Totally agree here.Originally Posted by jebus
The Bohs broke the rules & got docked points. It happens to teams all the time.
The issue against Shels is different. Hypothetically they could have lost the game due to the suspended player & therefore a replay is the only option.
If Bohs had lost the game, been docked 3 points for breaking the rules, & were challenging for the league, would they demand a replay (if it was an option, as it clearly will be going forward) on the basis that they fielded a suspended player? Bloody right they would.
I'm UCD not Shels before anyone starts throwing accusations.
"I always likened him to a Rolls Royce. You just used him once a week & he'd be flawless"
Townsend on McGrath
So the rules are superseded by the speculation of what may or may not have happened? Glad that's cleared up.
TO TELL THE TRUTH IS REVOLUTIONARY
The ONLY foot.ie user with a type of logic named after them!
All of this has happened before. All of it will happen again.
The problem Colie is that that's not what the rule is. You think it should be the rule and that's a fair opinion but the FAI should apply the rule as it is.
The rule also gives grounds for appeal, and action at the discretion of the comitee/board/barnyard.
Still a ****ing stupid decision.
God
Am I the only one in thinking that if a club (i.e. Bohs) are docked 3 points for effectively cheating, that said 3 points should go to the team they beat on the night? In this case I know there was a case on whether or not Bohs should have been docked the 3 points at all, but when they finally were, does it not make sense to at least have a replay? Don't get wrong, I'm all for this anti-EL group, but in this case I think a replay is the least the Eircom League could award a club that they have found to have been wronged in a match.
Jesus this is gonna get me in trouble isn't it?
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks