Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 12 of 13 FirstFirst ... 210111213 LastLast
Results 221 to 240 of 242

Thread: Bohs v Shels

  1. #221
    First Team dancinpants's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,304
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    12
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    27
    Thanked in
    18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Luke O'Riordan View Post
    No we didn't.

    We only had three points deducted.

    Your use of emoticons lead me to believe you are as confused as I am.

    You were deducted 3 points. Dropping you from 31 to 28.
    The "win" against Shels is scrubbed from the records and you are then dropped from 28 to 25. To me that seems almost like a FURTHER 3 points deduction.

  2. #222
    First Team BohsFans's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,660
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    12
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dancinpants View Post
    Your use of emoticons lead me to believe you are as confused as I am.

    You were deducted 3 points. Dropping you from 31 to 28.
    The "win" against Shels is scrubbed from the records and you are then dropped from 28 to 25. To me that seems almost like a FURTHER 3 points deduction.
    http://www.irishfootballonline.com/t...vision=Premier



    Looks like it!

    Can't be right though. The FAI decision is hardly binding. The el board of control haven't ratified it.

    FARCE!

  3. #223
    First Team dancinpants's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,304
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    12
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    27
    Thanked in
    18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BohsFans View Post
    http://www.irishfootballonline.com/t...vision=Premier



    Looks like it!

    Can't be right though. The FAI decision is hardly binding. The el board of control haven't ratified it.

    FARCE!

    Thats what I think anyway. Everyone is on here spouting off sh!t from the rule books. But the bottom line is, if a replay is granted - if the game is wiped from the records, then so should the 3 point deduction. As it stands Bohs have NOTHING to gain from a replay - if you win it, you will still be sitting at the end of the season with an asterix beside you in the league table inicating a 3 point deduction. I've read a few articles where its been suggested that Bohs could "win back" their 3 points - thats NOT going to happen. Looking at the league table, and a bit of simple mathmatics will tell you that

    If you want to get down to brass tacks, the replay is purely geared towards giving Shels an opportunity to gain 3 points. What benefit will Bohs get from this game - with regards to the league table? Nothing, no matter what way you dice and slice it.

    To follow on from Davids "hypothetical" scenario - should the replay go ahead, and (god forbid) a Bohs player is badly injured - would Bohs be in a position to take the FAI to court for forcing them to play a meaningless game?
    Last edited by dancinpants; 03/11/2006 at 4:34 AM.

  4. #224
    Reserves David's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    812
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    I didn't realise that it was in effect a 6 point deduction and now Bohs are playing to get 3 of those back. Absolute madness. As I said earlier the logical thing to do would have been (if Bohs were found guilty, and it seems there is a very good case for finding them not guilty) to award Shelbourne the win for the game. If the rules do not allow for this then they should be changed immediately. I thought it was only the IFA that screwed these things up. Why make it easy when it can be hard seems to be the attitude.

  5. #225
    First Team lofty9's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,208
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    17
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    63
    Thanked in
    43 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by David View Post
    I didn't realise that it was in effect a 6 point deduction and now Bohs are playing to get 3 of those back. Absolute madness. As I said earlier the logical thing to do would have been (if Bohs were found guilty, and it seems there is a very good case for finding them not guilty) to award Shelbourne the win for the game. If the rules do not allow for this then they should be changed immediately. I thought it was only the IFA that screwed these things up. Why make it easy when it can be hard seems to be the attitude.
    David, The rules were in place that Bohs should be docked the points. Precedent has been set by the league on various occaisions. The EL teams all signed up for the league and therefore by doing so accepted the rule book. Shels are one of those teams. The eircom league made the decision to deduct the points. There is no place for a replay in the rule book or for a 3-0 win. Fair play is the FAI's excuse to hand Ollie his Champions League spot and pay the wages of his mercenaries for another year. To change the rules mid season are idiotic and have led to the chaos.

    The Irish League gave the EL Derry, any chance of taking Shelbourne from us a thank you?
    As Irishmen we dilute our sense of nation by depending on the English to bring us our balls

  6. #226
    Banned dcfcsteve's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    6,345
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    74
    Thanked in
    35 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by David View Post
    I didn't realise that it was in effect a 6 point deduction and now Bohs are playing to get 3 of those back. Absolute madness. As I said earlier the logical thing to do would have been (if Bohs were found guilty, and it seems there is a very good case for finding them not guilty) to award Shelbourne the win for the game. If the rules do not allow for this then they should be changed immediately. I thought it was only the IFA that screwed these things up. Why make it easy when it can be hard seems to be the attitude.

    Now you see why I'd be happy for any all-island league to be run out of Belfast....!

  7. #227
    Reserves
    Joined
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    994
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    31
    Thanked in
    12 Posts
    Anyone see any similarities with the Rugby League story in New Zealand where NZ played an Australain who had a Kiwi Great grandmother rahter than grandmother (are you listenting Tony Cascarino). Anyway there seems to have been a quick decision whihc everyone accepts that NZ lose the points but Britain (who he played against) dont gain any.

    Of course in Ireland it's an opportunity to have a drawn out argument!

  8. #228
    Youth Team thomas's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    168
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    waffle

    For all the moaning Ollie is right, as the points deduction stood and boez didn't appeal Ollie was fully entitled to point out that UEFA granted 3-0 walkovers to the opposition in all such cases. The fact that they have given a replay is effectively the same thing, exept they might not get the 3-0.

    In dundalks case, they'd be threading thin ice, as would the fai in awarding a replay since the matter there still has the potential to go further, that would completely fook things up.

  9. #229
    Seasoned Pro OneRedArmy's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Location
    London-Derry-Dublin
    Posts
    4,893
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    84
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    140
    Thanked in
    82 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thomas View Post
    For all the moaning Ollie is right, as the points deduction stood and boez didn't appeal Ollie was fully entitled to point out that UEFA granted 3-0 walkovers to the opposition in all such cases. The fact that they have given a replay is effectively the same thing, exept they might not get the 3-0.

    In dundalks case, they'd be threading thin ice, as would the fai in awarding a replay since the matter there still has the potential to go further, that would completely fook things up.
    If ever there was a skewed analysis to suit your own club, thats it.

  10. #230
    First Team WeAreRovers's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2002
    Posts
    2,050
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    89
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    122
    Thanked in
    80 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by OneRedArmy View Post
    If ever there was a skewed analysis to suit your own club, thats it.
    Eh, I actually think Thomas's analysis doesn't suit Rovers. We'd love if Dundalk asked for and were granted a replay.

    Mind you, I'd prefer consistent, logical decision making across the board applied to all clubs. But then, I've always been a dreamer.

    KOH
    No One Likes Us, We Don't Care

  11. #231
    Seasoned Pro OneRedArmy's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Location
    London-Derry-Dublin
    Posts
    4,893
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    84
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    140
    Thanked in
    82 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by WeAreRovers View Post
    Eh, I actually think Thomas's analysis doesn't suit Rovers. We'd love if Dundalk asked for and were granted a replay.

    Mind you, I'd prefer consistent, logical decision making across the board applied to all clubs. But then, I've always been a dreamer.

    KOH
    Apologies Thomas.

    But I think the precendent in the Bohs case would carry, if it sticks through arbitration.

    Obviously its Dundalks perogative and since they have less to gain it makes it unlikely that a replay would be foisted upon them against their will.

    More worrying is the precedent established for the other cases (Hargan being one).

  12. #232
    Reserves Burnsie's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    302
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    136
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    67
    Thanked in
    47 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thomas View Post
    Ollie was fully entitled to point out that UEFA granted 3-0 walkovers to the opposition in all such cases..
    utter nonsense.

    what uefa would do is as irrelevant as what the north wicklow under 16 girls' hockey league would do. the eircom league rules are clear, and the precedents of their application are clear: 3 points deduction, no walkover, no replay.

    if ollie byrne doesn't like it, by all means he can lobby for the rule to be modified for next season.
    Last edited by Burnsie; 03/11/2006 at 1:42 PM. Reason: ire clouded my syntax

  13. #233
    Coach wws's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    GarageLand
    Posts
    2,813
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Burnsie View Post
    utter nonsense.

    what uefa would do is as irrelevant what the north wicklow under 16 girls' hockey league would do. the eircom league rules are clear, and the precedents of their application are clear: 3 points deduction, no walkover, no replay.

    if ollie byrne doesn't like it, by all means he can lobby for the rule to be modified for next season.

    WRONG

    uh uh

    what uefa do is paramount - and thats why ollie has them over a barrel here and thats why they made up a ruling with no reference to their own rules

  14. #234
    Reserves Burnsie's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    302
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    136
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    67
    Thanked in
    47 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wws View Post
    WRONG

    uh uh

    what uefa do is paramount - and thats why ollie has them over a barrel here and thats why they made up a ruling with no reference to their own rules
    where does it say that? genuinely? the league have the power to determine their own administrative rules. if this was the case, why weren't the UEFA rules mentioned in the decision?

  15. #235
    Coach wws's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    GarageLand
    Posts
    2,813
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Burnsie View Post
    where does it say that? genuinely? the league have the power to determine their own administrative rules. if this was the case, why weren't the UEFA rules mentioned in the decision?
    uuuhm i dunno sherlock
    Ollie issued the threat of appeal via that UEFA precedent
    its seems to have been enough to convince the fai - el or WHOEVER the fck issued this ruling that they'll back away

  16. #236
    Reserves LukeO's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Glasnevin
    Posts
    437
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    74
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dancinpants View Post
    Your use of emoticons lead me to believe you are as confused as I am.

    You were deducted 3 points. Dropping you from 31 to 28.
    The "win" against Shels is scrubbed from the records and you are then dropped from 28 to 25. To me that seems almost like a FURTHER 3 points deduction.
    Jesus that's even more disgraceful than I'd realised. To be honest our season has been so bad that I wasn't even aware how many points we were on, hence me not realising the further points deduction.

  17. #237
    Like the Fonz. Only a dog. Mr A's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2004
    Location
    In the gutter, but looking at the stars
    Posts
    11,557
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,762
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,371
    Thanked in
    1,553 Posts
    John Delaney has his say on things:

    FAI chief executive John Delaney refused to be drawn on the controversial state of the domestic league today, opting instead to keep his council until after tomorrow's eircom League Board of Control meeting.

    Whether or not Delaney will elaborate following that meeting remains to be seen but he has promised a "speedier process" to deal with registration and suspension issues once the FAI takes control of the league later this year.

    "It's important to learn from the past but certainly not live in it," he said when questioned on the litany of disputes that have dogged the domestic league in recent seasons.

    "We're working on putting different processes in place to learn from all the mistakes of the past, in all areas.

    "Going forward there will be speedier processes to deal with something, for example, which occurred in the middle of August and is only now being dealt with. . . that I believe will help in terms of process."
    For more see: http://www.ireland.com/sports/soccer...547475642.html
    #NeverStopNotGivingUp

  18. #238
    Godless Commie Scum
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Co Wickla
    Posts
    11,396
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    138
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    656
    Thanked in
    436 Posts
    What a knob - It's the bloody FAI part of the process that has dragged it out till now.
    If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.

  19. #239
    First Team lofty9's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,208
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    17
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    63
    Thanked in
    43 Posts
    Maybe next year they can do us all a favour by having something similar to the FA in England. This is a good site.

    http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/RulesAndRegulations/

    Interestingly on fair play:

    FAIR PLAY IN FOOTBALL
    means that EVERYONE connected with football
    • shows understanding of and respect for the Laws of the Game
    • supports the belief that the game should be played in an entertaining and positive way
    • behaves on and off the field in a sporting manner towards all others involved, be they players, officials or spectators, irrespective of results
    Maybe certain people should action this as this is what FAIR PLAY is.
    As Irishmen we dilute our sense of nation by depending on the English to bring us our balls

  20. #240
    First Team pól-dcfc's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    1,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    This whole debacle is a fúcking joke. The FAI are destroying the game, as is Ollie with his constant legal wranglings. The only way to sort this out is for all clubs to resign from the league and reform a new league with a clear and decent rule book and decent administration. Fúck Genesis and the new Super Ultra Extreme Premier Eircom FAI League.
    DCFC

Page 12 of 13 FirstFirst ... 210111213 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Shels v Bohs
    By A face in forum Premier & First Divisions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09/05/2011, 11:02 PM
  2. Shels v. Bohs on TV????
    By Larry 'da' Wyse in forum Bohemians
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 13/10/2004, 3:34 PM
  3. Bohs v Shels
    By eoinh in forum Premier & First Divisions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09/10/2004, 10:59 PM
  4. Bohs v Shels
    By liams in forum Cork City
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06/04/2004, 12:09 PM
  5. Bohs 0-1 Shels
    By Peadar in forum Cork City
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09/11/2002, 9:06 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •