What you said in the first paragraph wasn't that outlandish. Of who was playing in Poland, who should genuinely be a part of O'Neill's thinking going forward? Given, Ward, St Ledger (sorry Doc), Whelan, Andrews, Duff and Doyle should arguably not be considered. That leaves Keane, McGeady, Dunne and O'Shea. Of the other players that got playing time; Cox, Walters, Green and Long, at least 2 of them arguably aren't up to this level.
I'm not basing my opinion of Keane on Euro 2012. I am basing it on the last several qualification campaigns as well...
Ibrahimovic is a better player, playing for one of the top 6 teams in the world, a CL regular and has led Sweden to multiple tournament qualifications. Some players can go in their mid to late 30's (Giggs, Zanetti, Totti), some can't. Neither here nor there. Opinion just based on what I see.
And I understand I touched a nerve with my interpretation of Robbie Keane's comments. Apparently others have been guilty of the same interpretation.
http://talksport.com/sports-news/foo...ional-football
http://www.independent.ie/sport/socc...-26895402.html
http://www.joe.ie/football/euro-2012...by-trapattoni/
Last paragraph. What I said. Nothing wrong with that.
As far as what geysir said, I would find the stats that correspond with Robbie Keane's club career over the last half-dozen years more relevant than World Cup 2002. It's called context. The proof is in the pudding. His goals make him a valuable member of the squad like Dunne and O'Shea, not some deity that can't be criticised. Various other factors point to the possible benefits of other younger options, rotation and flexibility in other matches.
Bookmarks