You have regularly avoided answering very direct questions.
Will you ever cop on that your opinions don't rile people? You rehash that line to the point of tedium. Almost everything in post 135 above is presented disingenuously and it's a perfect example of what riles people.
As for McGeady, Scotland's antipathy is well documented. I didn't challenge you on that. I challenged your assertion that it was "clear" from the quoted passage that he was influenced by future success. I don't care if he was, it was simply not clear from the quoted passage. You evaded that (edit, I see you responded above albeit with a speculative remark).
In your para 2 above re Keane and Long, I don't think anyone really disagrees or at worst nobody thinks it's an unfair opinion. You have consistently assumed it's the view that is unpopular, it's not. It's your presentation.
Bookmarks