Wrt Robbie you found the quotes that everyone was aware of anyway and despite plenty of compelling counter argument about what he probably meant, most notably from Danny, you decided to interpret it in a way that suited you. You pretty clearly refused to countenance any other interpretation. That's how I remember it anyway. I also have a vague recollection of challenging you to accept a set of possible future circumstances as being the ultimate arbiter and I think, but couldn't be ar$ed to go back and check, that you decided to ignore it.
This is what Geysir refers to when he says you switch to victim mode.
But some people had to be reminded about it; and I don't know what I ever said that warranted being called "fraudulent".Originally Posted by Stuttgart88
Of course I am going to interpret it the way I want. That's what all of us are doing. It's a two-way street.
OK could you elaborate on that further and I will answer now.
The onus is on you to go back. You've ignored plenty of other stuff too.
And yes, interpret stuff as you want - we all do - but if Im engaging in a debate with someone I have the decency to consider reasonable counters. You have a habit of not doing so.
Wrt Grealish, you mainly got carried away rather than presented fraudulent argument ( that was Geysir's accusation, I accused you of using fallacy which is different). You thought Grealish's remark was disgraceful, others saw it as a fact of life in context of dual nationality.
But in the following passage it appears to me you jumped to a firm conclusion as to what he would do and where his priorities lie:
I'd counter that we don't know, that's actually the whole point. On balance of what we know I'd agree with Geysir that he is ours to lose and I personally think we should show him a bit of extra attention. Similarly, on balance of what we know about Keane and his attitude towards playing for Ireland I'd say his "walk away" remark was more benign than you think.
I thought your use of various goal scoring stats was selective and spurious but equally I agreed with the broad thrust of your argument that Keane should not be an automatic starter, although I qualified where my rationale differed from yours.
Stutts has summed it up pretty well above, but you're now misrepresenting the original gist of what you were saying. If I'm not mistaken, you attempted to portray it as if Grealish is taking us for fools, has his heart set on England and will switch at the slightest hint of a senior cap for them based purely on an ambiguous comment and the decisions that previous and unrelated England internationals of Irish heritage have made, as if we have any way of knowing for sure. Your tone was accusatory and condemnatory when there was no reason to be alarmist at all.
Honestly, don't feel so insecure or threatened. Thorough debate is all good and anyone responding to you is just offering a counter-argument to your own opinion (which does often happen to be of a contentious nature). It's a discussion forum and you're more than welcome here. Nobody's out to get you.Some of you really resemble a baying mob.
Well, except for that Geysir fellow. He definitely has it in for you.
Stutts you say he is ours to lose like geysir but what do the northerners say when they have players like Gibson wilson mcclean etc playing for them at underage level?
I do have to say tho towk is a breath of fresh air and anyone I know would share very similar views - generally. He has brought a smack of realism to the forum probably why he is getting dealt with a bit heavy handed....a baying mob might be a bit extreme though.
Towk do you go to home games?
Last edited by paul_oshea; 12/03/2014 at 8:55 PM.
I imagine they have their own equivalent of Paul O'Shea - a Paul Frazer perhaps - who remarks that such players are "wee turncoats waiting to happen".
I wasnt asking literally cd. Even if you were just looking for an easy in to respond with that
You set 'em up, I knock 'em down
Seriously, I'm not sure what 'dose of realism' you're referring to. It's hardly a surprise to anyone who's kept an eye on these things over time that players often have split loyalties. If anything, TOWK's overreaction to Grealish's comments sticks out because it's so unusual around here. When Shane Lowry opted to compete for Australia, I can't remember anybody here saying anything but good luck to him. The wee turncoat.
No thats not what I'm getting at.
What im saying is those players deep down harbour a desire if the chance comes and they are good enough to play for ireland. So I'm asking do you think they say "he is ours to lose", I doubt it very much.
I don't think it's that cut and dried either. Danny Kearns, for instance, cut his ties with Northern Ireland even though he might never be good enough to play for Ireland. Similarly, the McEleney brothers threw in their lot with Northern Ireland even though they were still in and around underage Ireland squads and are young enough to improve. I wouldn't say "he's ours to lose" but certainly I think when players come through the ranks with us they are a bit more likely to stay put than players in a similar situation at Northern Ireland. The only player who's been through the age groups that we've really "lost" to a better country is Michael Keane, and there were possibly familial pressures in there too with his brother on the England side.
Noel King had plans for Paddy McEleney and was on the phone asking for him to reconsider his switch to the IFA, so it's not as if they'll touch "certified dead wood" only. Not that I think there's a moral problem with players in demand legally deciding for themselves who they'd rather represent, but IFA supporters often like to try and disingenuously claim the suspect moral high ground on this, as if their association is distinct from all others in sacrificing its own self-interests through an adherence to some imagined code of virtues whereby it selects only players in which other associations have no known interest. This self-erected illusion helps validate, for them at least, their sorry indulgence in victimhood.
Hey, not all northerners are "them", y'know.
Anyhow, where were we? Yes, NI fans; they bleat and moan and they play the victim. They deny responsibility and they stick their heads in the sand. Jack Grealish doesn't select himself. Noel King selects Jack Grealish.
Power of selection ultimately remains in the hands of the association. With regard to the IFA, no association need let itself be "strung along" by any eligible player, or however it is that association and its supporters like to frame the circumstances whereby a young nationalist player who grows up north of the border might end up playing in the IFA's youth squads yet still harbour ambitions of playing for Ireland. Not that the relationship between player and association is beneficial on a one-way basis only anyhow - associations also get return from the players they select - but if the IFA doubt their players' commitment, they can always ask them for clarification. If they're happy enough to continue selecting uncertain players or players who've already expressed that their ultimate aspiration would be to play for Ireland if given the opportunity, that's their prerogative. If the player lies, that's admittedly poor form. There are plenty of players in the under-age NI set-up, however, who identify with ourselves in terms of support and NI youth coaches are well aware of this. These players don't even have to lie yet the IFA are delighted to still have them available for selection, so it's a bit much for them to cry foul when these players later legally desert and can follow through on their declared intentions by virtue regulations we all knew existed in the first place.
If Grealish did come out and say he was happy to give his all for us in proud recognition of his Irish heritage but that he ultimately aspired to play for England, the land of his birth, if that opportunity ever arose, can we be certain that Noel King would stop selecting him? Would we expect Noel King to refrain from selecting him? As it stands, we know that Grealish could potentially, although seemingly unlikely, entertain the notion of playing for England if he was to no longer be enjoying playing for us at some point in the future. With that knowledge, the choice of whether or not to continue selecting him would still rest in our hands. If the choice rested with me, I'd continue in a professional manner by selecting him. If he later switched to England down the line, so be it. He's a dual national, he hasn't lied to anyone and he's been enriching our under-age set-up since the age of 14, so it's not as if it's been all take on his part. There was no obligation on my part to continue selecting him, but I did, knowledgeable of the risk. I'm happy to put my faith in Noel King.
Sorry, by the way, Mick Doyle devotees! I understand y'all must be absolutely snapping at the ignorance of the turn his thread has taken.
Last edited by DannyInvincible; 13/03/2014 at 12:43 AM.
He'll be turning in his grave Danny.
I think on balance Grealish is more likely to stay with us. We hold the aces. That's what I'm trying to say Paul.
I also agree with most of what TOWK says on most things. That's got nothing to do with it. He actually hasn't brought much here in the way of new opinion. People have been frustrated by Keane for years. There was a couple of years of hysteria over James McCarthy. His views on dropping Keane or being upset with joint heritage footballers not being able to recite Ulysses in Irish is hardly revolutionary.
It's his belligerent and antagonistic manner that bugs me. If you read any of my posts either criticising him, thanking him or joining in with him you'll realise that. If you think bad manners is a breath of fresh air it says more about you than me.
For ages now you've been flying some flag or other from some higher place about realism. You should put it down.
Yes, I go to the majority of home games, work and college allowing.
I was going to go to Euro 2012 with my brother and his mates but I started going out with a girl I liked in late May so I decided to stay home. That decision paid off in spades as I was subsequently dumped on my birthday - the day of the first semi-final.
...and that's what you get for letting your heart lead your head.
Stutts will make you a profile on Match.com for a small price. (Interesting trades considered.) Just tell him all your likes/dislikes, hobbies and earning potential. The only problem is once he is done adding and subtracting, sometimes another foot.ie member comes up as your perfect match. (Not that there is anything wrong with that.)
No Somos muchos pero estamos locos.
Ok... Adrian Mole!!! That's a bit more than what we're used to here.
I like the impact you've had on the forum though.
Pages 1-3 were absolute comedy, and should go down in foot.ie folklore.
Here they come! It’s the charge of the “Thanks” Brigade!
this is the guy you need to talk about that: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/20...-hack-okcupid/
I assumed, gathered so actually, you make sense on most things, and a view shared by most who go to games. Your(Ireland international) football should lead your head and your heart, never a woman or anything else, ah the innocence and naivety of youth.
No Stutts, its not, his views are similar to SksStu, me and you and thats about it. Bad manners on a bloody forum, would ye get a life.
Well said peepee. Even if you are still wrong about how contracting works :P
Last edited by paul_oshea; 13/03/2014 at 1:23 PM.
I'm a bloke,I'm an ocker
And I really love your knockers,I'm a labourer by day,
I **** up all me pay,Watching footy on TV,
Just feed me more VB,Just pour my beer,And get my smokes, And go away
Paul wheeling out the old "most people who go to games" chestnut again. Classic stuff.
Posting Permissions
Quote
Bookmarks