Dr Ogba there is no way you can put Venables and Staunton in the same bracket.Did Stan manage Barcelona,Engerland to the Euro semis,Spuds to the cup?He has his faults but we aint gonna get the Gus Hiddinks of this world.
exactly, as i said before, if we are prioritising finding a candidate that will be looking to be with us in the long haul then we are going to be stuck with mediocrity like Brady, Venebles, Staunton etc....
Many posters (including myself) have been going on a while about getting someone with the experience and credentials to get us to the world cup. If (and big IF!) we get the right man to do the job for us then we've got to face the facts that he may jump ship after 2 years if he gets a big premiership offer.
I know which one I'd prefer....
"Well I think they'll be a little disappointed with that" - Matt Holland on TV3 after 5-2 drubbing by Cyprus
Dr Ogba there is no way you can put Venables and Staunton in the same bracket.Did Stan manage Barcelona,Engerland to the Euro semis,Spuds to the cup?He has his faults but we aint gonna get the Gus Hiddinks of this world.
Lippi only managed Italy for two years and Big Phil only managed Brazil for two years. They didn't do too bad. What's the obsession with long term? We're a small country and shouldn't think twice if a manager like Co Adriaanse wants the job.
Due to the board environment / fan pressure Porto isn't a job where managers hang around anyway, even Mourinho was only there for two seasons.
How much are Houghton, Givens and Howe on a week? Surely the longer this goes on, the more they earn the sneaky so and sos.
My concerns are global. I reject absolutely revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method, is love. I love you Sheriff Truman.
B*ll*ks. If you mean they were lucky then yes they were, but then the same could be said for most teams who do relatively well. You cant just write off his achievements and say they dont count.
I've said it before if Venables was Italian we'd be falling over ourselves to have him (see Trapattoni).
My concerns are global. I reject absolutely revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method, is love. I love you Sheriff Truman.
No probs DeckyDee.From what I remember they were lucky against Spain but looked a well organised outfit against Germayin the s/f.I dont paticularly take to Venables persona but players who have played under him talk about his coaching with great respect.I just think we are losing perspective.There is no way you can equate Stans glorious stint with Walsalls reserves with Venables experience.
I was living in Holland in 96 and the Dutch media and fans I met said England should have won the tournament. They were very impressed with the way England played. Unlucky rather than lucky was the prevailing view.
One of the things I like about Venables is he has just turned 65 so I reckon we could get 3/4 campigns out of him if things go well.
THe likes of Alladryce - a good WC campaign and the PL clubs start sniffing around and he gone in a flash.
I agree. I know England were at home that year, but there is no question in my mind that Venables had England playing the most positive, organised and attractive football I've ever seen them play at any tournament. The biggest problem in international football is motivating the team and in my view Venables did that with England brilliantly that year.
I'd feel very positive about him as potential manager. I find the "holier than thou" attitude quite ironic about his shady past. Since when did us Irish ever have a problem with politicians and leaders being less than perfect?
the thing was when he was managing England he was behind it 100% he loved the job. he probably would of done it for nothing. since then, in most of the other managerial jobs he's had, he hasn't give them the same time or commitment as he did the England job. they usually take a back seat to his business commitments. Even when he was assistant to mcLaren he refused to give up his newspaper column through which he ended up alienating himself from mcLaren.
I'd have no problem with venables if he was taking the job on with 100% commitment but i (and most other people) cant help but think he'll go into it half heartedly again, and see it as a bit of an earner. Reports from when he was after the bulgarian job were that he wanted to take on the bulgarian job on the basis that he stayed in england and watched the bulgarian players on tv, and turned up only whenever there was a game on!!
So really its not about his "shady past". Its about the amount of time and energy he would put into the role.
You mean to say that it would be unlikely to see El Tel down at St. Colman's on a Tuesday night at a league cup game checking out the rupmours about Dav O'Neill being the next big thing? Or going to Stranolar (Harps will be thinking about moving on by the time there is an appointment made) for the "North West Derby" some bitter night in November on the off chance that Keith Foy might be lining out for the away team, as he has finally realised that it is several years since we had a regular left full. WHat kind of uncommitted manager is that?
Let's start the campaign here:
EL TEL, GO HELL
IF YOU DON'T GO TO THE E.L.!
That question was less stupid, though you asked it in a profoundly stupid way.
Help me, Arthur Murphy, you're my only hope!
Originally Posted by Dodge
Bookmarks