I liked Kerr as a manager and wanted him to be re-appointed (as it was obvious Martin O'Neill wasn't going to accept the post), but I can understand why the Kerr bashers wanted him rid. He didn't qualify from a group that was within our grasp, so I can see why he was let go.
What gets my goat up is that nobody appreciates the football we played up to the Cyprus match under Kerr. Away against Israel we were superb. Great early goal, and then the keep ball we played was excellent, possibly the best I've seen. We dominated the game, were unlucky to concede a good equaliser and were even unluckier not to bag a winner. Of all the teams that played in Israel we controlled them the best.
As for the home game against Israel, we got off to a flyer, and the substitution he made was the right one. Coasting to victory, the right thing to do was shore the midfield up. I've no doubt that we were p*xed unlucky in the last group.
The fact that so many rumours were coming from the camp was also worrying. Our most professional international manager in terms of setup and the players were supposedly unhappy about this. That annoys me. There are many supporters who travel home and abroad, pay touts ridiculous prices for tickets and can afford it. There are many who can't. We deserve people to represent us who should be doing their utmost for the national team. I don't think this was honestly the case in the last campaign.
As I said earlier, I can understand re:results why people wanted him gone but to blame it all on Kerr is foolhardy. The players were equally rssponsible.
Bookmarks