Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Big Sam 'worried' over BBC Panorama Probe

  1. #21
    First Team 4tothefloor's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Limerick
    Posts
    1,977
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    12
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    24
    Thanked in
    15 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lionel Ritchie View Post
    I think it looks fairly bad for Sam.

    I think Chelsea can expect to need to pick up three more points than they'd planned on and I think Liverpool are heading for the same yellow card Chelsea are currently on for 'Tapping up' ...
    That's ridiculous! There's no comparison between the two incidents. Chelsea offered hard figures and even talked about the young lads role in the reserve team. Arnesen clearly knew alot about the player and had everything well thought through. It was baltent tapping up, and he's done it to more than a few young Leeds Utd players recently. The book should be thrown at him.

    Liverpool on the other hand did nothing wrong. The agent went to them touting his player saying he was unhappy at 'Boro. All Liverpool said was they'd be interested in signing him, but only as a pro when he turns 17. Absolutely nothing wrong with that, and very much by the book. No money was discussed and the Liverpool people showed no real knowledge of the player and no great desire to sign him. The piece on Liverpool was a load of bo||ocks and was more to do with the agent touting the player rather than anything Liverpool had done. The piece on Harry Redknapp was also a load of crap. Again Redknapp did nothing wrong except say he'd be interested in signing Andy Todd, again after he was OFFERED the player! This program was total sh!t and a waste of time...

    Sam Allardyce is clearly corrupt. Harry Redknapp was the guy the agents were talking about when his name kept getting blipped/***** out, so again he's probably corrupt. But the journalistic approach and complete lack of evidence was laughable.

    Quote Originally Posted by jebus View Post
    Oh and did anyone else audible groan when their deal to get a manager accepting money from them fell apart at the last minute? Kind of lost interest after that to be honest
    Exactly, it was too much of a coincidence for me. Disaster of an investigation and a brilliant opportunity to unmask corruption lost.

  2. #22
    Capped Player
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Dublin 7
    Posts
    20,251
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lionel Ritchie View Post
    The dutch guy -an employee of Chelsea (academy manger?) who appears to have executive officer status -talked sums with an agent about a player he knew to be on Boro's books. it's against the rules.
    Was it Arnesen on the tv footage? If so he screwed & Chelsea should be docked 3 points. No surprise really as Chelsea tapped him up while at Spurs who then went on to basically blackmail Chelsea for some decent cash.

    I wonder will RTE copy the BBC? Sure don't the copy everything else. We have enough advisiors & heres the Big Man & the Crafty man
    http://www.forastrust.ie/

    Bring back Rocketman!

  3. #23
    Banned
    Joined
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    896
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    120
    Thanked in
    55 Posts

    Cool poor harry

    I would be goin ballistic if i was harry, they really did the dirt on him without nothing. if i was harry id be gettin someone to pay smartarse knut and that bbc hack a visit some late evening in the winter. Harry and venables i personally wouldnt trust but you cant hang guys out to dry with nothing. and that film had shag all

  4. #24
    International Prospect bennocelt's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Basel (Allschwil)
    Posts
    5,829
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,823
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    436
    Thanked in
    335 Posts
    im delighted, i cant stand that pig Sam A
    and harry redknapp

    i didnt see the programme but listened to the debates etc on Five Live

    a lot of the evidence was kept off the show for legal reasons,

    and really if there is any suing to be done, i doubt the BBc would be going to court, wouldnt it be the agents?

    bung culture should not be accepted at all

    wonder is alex furguson clean?

  5. #25
    International Prospect jebus's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    6,847
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    49
    Thanked in
    29 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bennocelt View Post

    wonder is alex furguson clean?
    I think we all know the answer to that one. Ever wonder why United paid over the odds for Rio, Ronaldo, Carrick etc. Either they're the biggest mugs in the game or there is something crooked going on

  6. #26
    Seasoned Pro drinkfeckarse's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Scotland but my heart is in Ireland
    Posts
    3,131
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jebus View Post
    I think we all know the answer to that one. Ever wonder why United paid over the odds for Rio, Ronaldo, Carrick etc. Either they're the biggest mugs in the game or there is something crooked going on
    That's a pretty big generalisation as English clubs will always have to pay top dollar to take another English clubs best talent but I remember reading that a few months before they actually signed Ronaldo, they had been offered him for approx £4-£5 million less than the £12.75 that they paid.

    Always thought that was strange...
    Top Breeders recommend drinkfeckarse....

  7. #27
    International Prospect jebus's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    6,847
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    49
    Thanked in
    29 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by drinkfeckarse View Post
    That's a pretty big generalisation as English clubs will always have to pay top dollar to take another English clubs best talent but I remember reading that a few months before they actually signed Ronaldo, they had been offered him for approx £4-£5 million less than the £12.75 that they paid.

    Always thought that was strange...
    Heard the same, apparantly a month before United took him for £12.75 Liverpool, Inter and Juventus were amongst others offered him for around the £7 million mark. With Carrick I reckon they could easily have gotten him for at less than they did if they really wanted to. And remember that Leeds were in financial difficulty when they took Rio for £28 million(wasnt it?), whilst Newcastle got equally rated Johnaton Woodgate for £9 million, which sounds more like what I would have been offering for Rio

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Panorama on coke
    By MojoPin in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29/01/2008, 8:32 AM
  2. Scientology on Panorama
    By paul_oshea in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 17/05/2007, 12:28 PM
  3. Panorama Hooligan show
    By Neish in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 05/08/2006, 9:29 PM
  4. BBC One Panorama program
    By AmenToThat in forum World League Football
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 01/03/2005, 4:18 PM
  5. Anyone else worried....
    By Éanna in forum Cork City
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04/11/2001, 5:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •