Can anyone explain how the Clare League have come up with the 8 months suspension for this offense. What is the criteria they use. This looks to me as a figure that has been pulled out of thin air and the player in question has benn made an example of. Why , when the Clare league and the referees have a problem with the level of abuse been thrown at them not come up with a transparent method of punishment that is outlined to the clubs at the beginning of the season. This decision is an over reaction to what is a problem in the Clare league and one that seems to be getting worse. It is understandable that the refs do not want to be abused and from what I have seen this season if the hardline approach they have taken here is their answer to the problem then there will be alot of clubs struggling to field teams with the amount of suspensions. IMO there should be a whole reveiw of the way the league is run , from fixtures to referring and the whole approach by the clubs. Remember the palyers that are out on the pitch are representatives of the club and they have to take some level of responsiblity in the things that are going on . There seems to be a them against us attitude between the clubs and the people who are running the league.
Bookmarks