Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 26 of 26 FirstFirst ... 16242526
Results 501 to 515 of 515

Thread: Advice on the Laws of the Game

  1. #501
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    84
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    11 Posts
    Thanks NFB. The game was actually a local junior game and you seem bang on with your assessment. It happened in a split second and most people feel that even though the referee was technically right he could have used the excuse that he was in the process of awarding the penalty when the other player fired wide. The incident was very similar to what happened in the attached clip (first goal) and in this case the penalty was given .

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVoJ...oad%5Fpolicy=1

  2. #502
    Reserves
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    657
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NeverFeltBetter View Post
    I don't see anything in the laws that permit a referee to reverse an advantage so I would assume it would be a goal kick and a suitable caution for the player that had infringed. However, given that the scenario you have described would happen so quickly, I suspect a ref wouldn't have time to even signal an advantage, so may be in a position to award a penalty.

    VAR might also complicate such a scenario.
    Would not agree, if a ref. is playing advantage in any other part of the pitch, u see it all the time where he gives a team an advantage, they
    loses the ball in a short period of time, length is the question?, he will call back the play and give the free kick. A peno. is no different and actually more important that the ball is brought back and peno given, more often or not the advantage is not brought back. Take the example of Salah against Newcastle when their was a foul when he was pulled back,some said he should have kept going and got his shot away, question if he failed to score would he be given the peno.

  3. #503
    Reserves
    Joined
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    605
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    243
    Thanked in
    126 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Round Tower View Post
    Would not agree, if a ref. is playing advantage in any other part of the pitch, u see it all the time where he gives a team an advantage, they
    loses the ball in a short period of time, length is the question?, he will call back the play and give the free kick. A peno. is no different and actually more important that the ball is brought back and peno given, more often or not the advantage is not brought back. Take the example of Salah against Newcastle when their was a foul when he was pulled back,some said he should have kept going and got his shot away, question if he failed to score would he be given the peno.
    I referee RT, and this came up as a specific question during one of the quarterly seminar's.

    The advice were were given was that players weren't entitled to "two bites of the cherry"..

    We were showed for example one video of a player going around a defender, being illegally tackled, going off balance but not falling down, getting a shot away while off balance, but seeing the ball just go past the post. Had the player gone down, it was a clear penalty, so most of us thought "no advantage, bring it back and award it"..

    Advice was no, he took a chance to score and missed.. no advantage, goal kick.

  4. #504
    International Prospect NeverFeltBetter's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Gouldavoher
    Posts
    5,175
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    259
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    812
    Thanked in
    581 Posts
    Would it be fair to say that, in the specific scenario outlined, the shot at goal (which was missed) is the advantage being given?
    Author of Never Felt Better (History, Film Reviews).

  5. #505
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    84
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    11 Posts
    In the video clip I posted it could be argued that once the defender got back to challenge Barlow the advantage was lost and that may be why the referee gave the penalty. I still think that though what 'insidetherock' says is correct, where there is very little time between the incident and the follow up shot (in the match I was at it was seconds) the referee could call play back & use the excuse that there wasn't enough time between the foul & the effort on target for them to either blow for the foul or to play/signal/shout an advantage. Or maybe referees should never use advantage rule in the penalty box!!

    Ps insidetherock, are you a South Tipp ref?
    Last edited by Siberian; 11/01/2019 at 10:41 AM.

  6. #506
    Reserves
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    657
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Insidetherock View Post
    I referee RT, and this came up as a specific question during one of the quarterly seminar's.

    The advice were were given was that players weren't entitled to "two bites of the cherry"..

    We were showed for example one video of a player going around a defender, being illegally tackled, going off balance but not falling down, getting a shot away while off balance, but seeing the ball just go past the post. Had the player gone down, it was a clear penalty, so most of us thought "no advantage, bring it back and award it"..

    Advice was no, he took a chance to score and missed.. no advantage, goal kick.
    Did not know u were a ref. and i am not one, our junior team had a simuler situation last season in Mayo league, one of our player was through on goal went o go around the keeper, got clipped put off balance and put his shot wide, the ref. did not call it back for the foul. To make it worse it cost 2 points and a chance of promotion, i think iits wrong as it's giving advantage to the team doing wrong and penailising a player doing the right thing, u here people including me of players not staying on their feet and trying to score.
    So what is the difference a player is fouled in midfield, puts off balance, he tries to play on but loses the ball, the ref. call back the play for the foul?.
    Is it a case refs differ and teams suffer.
    Last edited by Round Tower; 11/01/2019 at 4:58 PM.

  7. #507
    International Prospect NeverFeltBetter's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Gouldavoher
    Posts
    5,175
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    259
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    812
    Thanked in
    581 Posts
    Something I have never seen before (though I'm sure its not the first time) just now in the Women's WC game between Spain and South Africa: four Spanish players forming their own wall a few feet ahead of the South African one when Spain got a scorable free-kick. I assume this is a response to the new rules saying you can't join an opposition wall ahead of a free? Interesting tactic either way. Oh, and they missed if anyone's wondering.
    Author of Never Felt Better (History, Film Reviews).

  8. #508
    Reserves
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    657
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    On Sun. we sent a former Mayo League referee Gos. Alexander to heaven reffing, he was a ref. in the late 80's early 90's, he must hold some reccoed sendding 32 off in a soccer match.
    RIP Gos.

  9. #509
    Reserves
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    657
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    Local junior soccer match, goalkeeper let a freekick in over his head into the goals, in a gesture of disgust he kicked the goalpost fairly hard in disgust, no player near it, the ref. booked him for it, he got sentoff later rightly for a 2nd yellow.

    Was the first yellow deserved.

  10. #510
    Apprentice Subprime's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Yes the first card was correct. Also players are not supposed to clean the soles of their boots against a goal post . Safety and dissent! When I was a ref, that was the instruction given.
    “The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views,” Dr. Who

  11. #511
    Reserves
    Joined
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    605
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    243
    Thanked in
    126 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Subprime View Post
    Yes the first card was correct. Also players are not supposed to clean the soles of their boots against a goal post . Safety and dissent! When I was a ref, that was the instruction given.
    Harsh, but yep, letter of the Law.

    I can imagine the ref heard a few expletives when he gave the second yellow

  12. #512
    Reserves
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    657
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Subprime View Post
    Yes the first card was correct. Also players are not supposed to clean the soles of their boots against a goal post . Safety and dissent! When I was a ref, that was the instruction given.
    Have u ever seen or a player booked for cleaning the soles of their boots against a goal post. Safety is debateable but how is it dissent, is it on them grounds that the first yellow card shown to the keeper was correct.

  13. #513
    Reserves
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    657
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Insidetherock View Post
    Harsh, but yep, letter of the Law.

    I can imagine the ref heard a few expletives when he gave the second yellow
    Yes but the keeper is always ccomplaining and giving out to the refs., the best was when a ref. who has officiated at European and International level. The keeper was complaining to the ref., i said to him to basicaly sh-t-pp, the ref turned around to me and said "it was ok, they were having a conversation". The ref last Sun. is known as the other ref. wanabee.

  14. #514
    Apprentice Subprime's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    "Have u ever seen or a player booked for cleaning the soles of their boots against a goal post. Safety is debateable but how is it dissent, is it on them grounds that the first yellow card shown to the keeper was correct."

    That directive was from the league and advised also to stop players making rutts in the ground when taking free kicks as it creates a danger for players because they might trip over the little mound and it damages the pitch. Kicking the goal posts is potential damage to equipment and a danger to themselves "if they kicked it too hard2 (a player shall not be a danger to others or to themselves). The dissent is the same as a player hoping the ball off the ground, or kicking it away. Probably given as a show of dissent. As you say, if he was known for being mouthy, then ref probably took the opportunity presented.
    “The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views,” Dr. Who

  15. #515
    Reserves
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    657
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    In tonights PL game, Palace had a peno saved by Da Gea but VAR ruled that he was off the line, so it was retaken but a different player took it, in the 018 season we had a situation where we scored from a penalty which we scored from, but a player had encroached into the area. The ref. ordered a retake but insisted that the same penalty taker had to take the 2nd penalty, was it changed the laws.

Page 26 of 26 FirstFirst ... 16242526

Similar Threads

  1. Laws of the Game
    By Jwal in forum Junior League
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19/02/2008, 9:52 PM
  2. Quiz on the Laws of the Game (Round 8)
    By The Ref in forum Junior League
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 28/10/2006, 4:56 PM
  3. Quiz on the Laws of the Game (Round 6)
    By The Ref in forum Junior League
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 16/10/2006, 8:45 PM
  4. Quiz on the Laws of the Game (Round 2)
    By The Ref in forum Junior League
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09/10/2006, 3:32 PM
  5. Penalties......the Laws of the game
    By wws in forum St Patrick's Athletic
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 10/07/2003, 3:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •