Limerick v United

[mypost]

You can't delete a team's results, and then carry over suspensions of matches that don't count. If you do, we're set for another long round of court cases.

[Terry]

In fairness, the leagues should be called "The high courts leagues"

[gufct]

who carries the suspension Terry not the club i have heard that rovers are being docked three points which probably means he was suspended for 1 game. The announcement is due next wednesday and Rovers have known about this for quite some time if u check thier message boards.

[JW.]

Top-notch stuff last night. Wes Charles really has to be seen to be believed - he is way ahead of this level. Ronan Frawley quietly excellent beside him as always. This was what Division 1 should be about: limited players at least trying to play the game. We had some lovely first-half moves. Dowdy missed a good chance and 2 sitters before we scored, but his work-rate is exemplary.
Slab was back to his best... I can't see us being beaten by Harps but it'll be a hard-earned win if we achieve it.

[DmanDmythDledge]

You can't delete a team's results, and then carry over suspensions of matches that don't count. If you do, we're set for another long round of court cases.

Exactly. The team's result was deleted not the players. A look at the top goalscorer charts would have pointed that out. It is Rovers fault that they did not clarify the situation.

[thescoringgoals]

the decision to take the points off them that they had from wins vrs dublin city(so they will go further ahead at the top),so if that decision is overturned results AND SUSPENSIONS involving dublin city will count again so trying to wriggle out of it by that way might not work.but as terry said its the player who was suspended so reguardless of club played for he WAS still suspended.and as another person said it should be plain black and white,if he played while suspended -3 points,end of story.but the fai will find some grey area for a "massive" club-with no stadium and who nearly went bust recently.