I saw that film on DVD a few weeks ago.
Whats the story with the new film coming in to the cinema now,
United 93. Is it basicially the same film?
If the US Home air defence system was as bad as it is portrayed in the above film, I am surprised the Soviets didn't fly a few passenger planes loaded with nuclear war heads into a few cities during the Cold War. Also if Flight 93 had been delayed on the ground a bit longer the passengers would be alive today![]()
Forget about the performance or entertainment. It's only the result that matters.
I saw that film on DVD a few weeks ago.
Whats the story with the new film coming in to the cinema now,
United 93. Is it basicially the same film?
Larry Be Wyse
www.acsportsimages.com
Essentially it is, but it was made with the co-operation of the families. The reviews have been quite good over here.Originally Posted by Ash
Have Boot Disk, will travel
The cinema film just released concentrates mostly on the Flight Control centres. The film I saw on TV deals more with the passengers on the plane.
Forget about the performance or entertainment. It's only the result that matters.
Well apparently Flight 93 is a superior film to United 93 which would make sense as the latter is a TV movie while the former was directed by Paul Greengrass (legend).
Check out my new sports blog http://www.action81.com
I think you're getting confused there. United 93 is a theatre movie which was directed by Paul Greengrass, who also directed Bloody Sunday. It gives a realtime account of events in the air and on the ground with the usual high attention to detail associated with Greengrass.Originally Posted by Aberdonian Stu
Have Boot Disk, will travel
That's right my apologies. The similarity in names is blatant cause for a mix up.
Check out my new sports blog http://www.action81.com
Bookmarks