Fridays latest

**mypost** · 09/04/2006, 1:02 AM

As a sidebar, after coming back from our game against Kilkenny, Sky Sports News showed all the LOI scores as usual, only to find Waterford 1-1 Shelbourne.

TV 3 posted up the scores on their nightly sports show, including Pats 0 Drogheda 1, (Keegan 7).

They may as well be Aertel.

Ffs, why bother showing basic info that is wrong?? Just as well that we have foot.ie for updates.

**TonyD** · 09/04/2006, 5:10 PM

Originally Posted by Cosmo

I thought we did enough to deserve all 3 points though? Especially in the second half!! 5 clean sheets in the league for first 5 matches with a dodgy enough keeper, I'll take that! Wait until we hit good form

I suppose I'm bound to disagree, but I didn't think Pats deserved to lose.Yes, ye played well in the second half, but it was a tight game, and we were always in it. I thought it was headed for a nil nil, which probably would have been fair. Don't know what Pats goal in the first half was disallowed for

As for the pitch, yeah it was poor, very soft. Still better than Sligo the previous week though.

**wws** · 09/04/2006, 7:38 PM

I didnt think the pitch was poor at all - you've got to bear in mind the weather conditions - several torrential downpours on the day of and in the lead up to the game - and the fact that several LoI games have been cancelled already this season - Richmond Park has been playable so far - not all grounds have been in the present weather.

**pineapple stu** · 10/04/2006, 1:06 PM

Originally Posted by mypost

As a sidebar, after coming back from our game against Kilkenny, Sky Sports News showed all the LOI scores as usual, only to find Waterford 1-1 Shelbourne. TV 3 posted up the scores on their nightly sports show, including Pats 0 Drogheda 1, (Keegan 7). They may as well be Aertel.

Ffs, why bother showing basic info that is wrong?? Just as well that we have foot.ie for updates.

Oh the irony of the above post form someone who counters any attempt to point out factual errors by saying "It's not a spelling test" and who openly acknowledges that he's completely and utterly biased (i.e. isn't worried about bring right)

**mypost** · 10/04/2006, 1:44 PM

Originally Posted by pineapple stu

Oh the irony of the above post form someone who counters any attempt to point out factual errors by saying "It's not a spelling test" and who openly acknowledges that he's completely and utterly biased (i.e. isn't worried about bring right)

Another free ad for the Premier Review.

Unlike TV3 (who are well-paid to post correct info), it will be correct on the PR.

Regarding the other point btw, you've already been told by a mod, that there is nothing wrong with how I write it either.