Am I getting it right in saying that the main argument being used by the GAA is that because that the percentage amount of state funding going into the stadium is so high that it should be open to other sports? If so they are most likely shooting themselves in the foot because there is no, to the best of my knowledge, national "argeement" stating that if state funding goes beyond a certain point other sports must be accommodated. If the GAA wins the case it sets a precedent in my mind that will lead to all sports facilities with any state money being forced, whether they like it or not, to open their facilities to other sports. That is, their rule 41 (or whatever it is) will be inconsistent with any ruling in the GAA favour and thus illegal to enforce. It could be also argued on this line that the GAA can't charge the FAI or the IRFU for use of Croke Park. Rather the state should be the recipient of those "rents".
Bookmarks