Iraq was an artificial country when it was established in the first place, so has no sacred right or need to continue existing as it is currently constituted. The big problem, however, is that if Iraq fragmented the Shi'ite part would probably look to join Iran - and the West would never let that happen.
I would like to see more/complete autonomy for the Kurds. I don't give a feck what impact it would have on Turkey and Syria - the Kurds have been pished around by the West and their neighbours for long enough now. It won't happen though...
Regardless - I have a rather harsh view of these things. Countries both have a right and a need to sort their own situation out. External meddling only delays the inevitable and prevents a longer-term workable solution from being determined. Countries like Ireland, America, England, Spain and Yugoslavia needed Civil Wars to sort out fundamental issues regarding the direction in which they were going. Whilst i'd hate to see any further life lost, civil war's can often be important events in sorting out incredibly complex and volatile situations. An unpopular view I'm sure, but a valid one none-the-less. Pretending massive fundamnetal differences don't exist, and trying to suppress any violent symptoms they create, does not solve the situation at all.
Bookmarks