Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 64

Thread: What rule would you change or bring in?

  1. #21
    First Team Thunderblaster's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Computer Desktop
    Posts
    2,463
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    18
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Kit Rule Change

    That all womens soccer should be kitted out in kit like womens beach volleyball. That will get the male hormones aroused at womens football and evryone would want to go. Yum yum yummy!!! Ooh la la!! plenty of sexy curves!!!!
    Never play leapfrog with a unicorn!!

  2. #22
    Reserves
    Joined
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sligo
    Posts
    326
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    i think that anyone found diving should be sent off..i would hate if a video ref was brought because football is a lot more interesting when the ref has to make a split second decision

  3. #23
    New Signing hamish's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Beeslow (Bsloe)
    Posts
    4,535
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Risteard
    I think they're all rules Hamish!
    That's what I said............eh............I think.
    Just a pity the rules aren't applied.

  4. #24
    Reserves crc's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    953
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    27
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    I hate when defenders 'shepherd' the ball out of play for a goal kick. If I had the power (lovely power!), I'd call that obstruction unless the defender actually touched the ball (in which case he wouldn't let the ball just roll out of play!)

    This rule would be similar in its ethos to the back-pass rule - the idea being to keep the ball in play.

  5. #25
    Banned
    Joined
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    6,822
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    What about players robbing yards/metres taking throw ins?

  6. #26
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    39,718
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,008
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,252
    Thanked in
    3,489 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ken foree
    sorry probably bein thick here but isn't that "hand to ball"?? ball to hand i always thought was when the ball strikes the hand accidentally, for which penos (shouldn't be but) are given sometimes. i guess you're right in the implication that the latter should not be a peno but if a ref's unsure (speed of play, obstructed view) then there's a middle ground no?
    Yeah, think you're right on ball to hand...

    The middle ground you mention is only when the ref's unsighted - not really a middle ground per se. The distinction between the ball striking the hand accidentally and handball being awarded is whether the ref decides the player had time to move his hand out of the way. Either way, the ref has to make a call and we're left with no middle ground.

    A free in the box can only be given for an indirect free-kick offence - backpass and obstruction being the main ones. I don't think there are many "unintentional fouls" as you define them - they may fall under the heading of "He was stupid to dive in like that", in which case penalty.

  7. #27
    International Prospect mypost's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2004
    Location
    foot.ie Night Shift
    Posts
    5,120
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    247
    Thanked in
    176 Posts
    3 rule changes:

    1. I want a rule brought in where "injured" players who leave the field, are made to wait a full 60 seconds before being allowed back on the pitch. Too many players abuse the rule, and anyone who is genuinely injured doesn't just leave the field, and return immediately. That would clean up that aspect of time-wasting.

    2. As it's also time-wasting, I would like something done about that personal bugbear of mine, of players keeping the ball at the corner flag in injury time, e.g. ref adding on more time on top of the allotted injury time, at the end of the game. That would clean that up. This particular time-wasting virus, seems to be only prevalent in Irish and British football. You rarely see it in other countries.

    3. To revive "interest" in the rubbish pit that is Women's football, a rule should be brought in that insists the players wear skirts rather than shorts, like in hockey and tennis. Now that would be a welcome change.

  8. #28
    Coach Poor Student's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    8,047
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    239
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    111
    Thanked in
    71 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mypost


    To revive "interest" in the rubbish pit that is Women's football, a rule should be brought in that insists the players wear skirts rather than shorts, like in hockey and tennis. Now that would be a welcome change.
    That's the second type of post like this. Leave the sexism outside of this forum lads.

  9. #29
    Reserves
    Joined
    May 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    417
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu
    Keepers can hold the ball for 6 seconds before conceding an indirect free-kick.


    There is no such rule. That's why the players kick the ball out of play or (occasionally) play on. The ref has the power to stop play and restart with a hop-ball if he feels the injury warrants it.

    Oh, and I'd make all commentators, managers, players, etc. undertake an extensive refereeing course before getting behind a mic.
    What I meant was that when a player is injured or rolling around on the floor pretending to be injured (!) the trainer can come on and treat him while play continues ... everyone else just plays on around him.

  10. #30
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    39,718
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,008
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,252
    Thanked in
    3,489 Posts
    Meh. Could well end up getting in the way. I remember treating some rugger player on the pitch one time - didn't know that was the rule and the next thing, the match kicks off again and I've got a hoarde or rugger buggers running right in my direction after the ball! Legged it fairly quickly... Not an ideal rule for treating genuinely injured players!

    It raises other problems though. Does an injured player affect the offside? If a clearance comes off the physio and out for a throw, who's throw is it? Don't think there's much of an advantage in it, to be honest.

  11. #31
    Seasoned Pro Block G Raptor's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2005
    Location
    ITB campus
    Posts
    3,986
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Think its ridiculous when a player is treated on the pitch for five mins and then has to walk of after receiving treatment only to walk back on. the rule is that a player can not be treated on the field of play but must leave the pitch for treatment except in extreme circumstances(broken leg, head injury etc). it is totally pointless at the moment the way a player goes down the physio comes on applies the magic sponge and the player and physio walk off for the player to walk back on.

  12. #32
    Godless Commie Scum
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Co Wickla
    Posts
    11,396
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    138
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    656
    Thanked in
    436 Posts
    I'd introduce citing rules like they have in rugby.

    A citing commisioner who can make judgements himself, and both teams can cite opposition players. Possible also include the ref - like in Rugby League where they can refer an incident their not sure about. Any diving, off the ball incidents etc. I know it is some times done, but there's no formal way that the opposition can cite people to the video panel - only if the media kick up enough about it.
    If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.

  13. #33
    Capped Player Schumi's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2001
    Location
    A difficult place to get three points
    Posts
    10,741
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    203
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    351
    Thanked in
    174 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Macy
    A citing commisioner who can make judgements himself, and both teams can cite opposition players.
    Allowing teams to cite opposition players would lead to widespread abuse and tit-for-tat citings. It's best left to an independant person.
    We're not arrogant, we're just better.

  14. #34
    Reserves
    Joined
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    841
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderblaster
    That all womens soccer should be kitted out in kit like womens beach volleyball. That will get the male hormones aroused at womens football and evryone would want to go. Yum yum yummy!!!Ooh la la!!plenty of sexy curves!!!!
    Yeah but I'd say even those beach volleyballers would look a lot worse in the rain. A tan does a lot for ladies

    As for rules, here's something I always wondered. 2 scenarios (with examples)

    1) John O'Flynn breaks through on goal and is one on one with Dean Delaney. Hawkins makes a last gasp tackle and misses the ball but O'Flynn is brought down. City get penalty, and Hawkins is sent off as he is the "last man".

    2) Again flynn breaks through on goal and Hawkins is gone so nobody can catch him. He is one on one with the keeper, and goes around him. He knocks the ball past Delaney and is taken down. This time, Hearey has got back on the line as a "covering defender". Delaney gets a yellow card.

    Surely both tackles denied a one-on-one, but most of the time, the keeper will get off with a yellow because there was a "covering defender", but the defender will get a red even though there is a "covering keeper".

    Seem weird?
    The glass isn't half full or half empty it's just too damn big!

  15. #35
    Reserves
    Joined
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Dublin 15
    Posts
    262
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Not sure if it has been mentioned but would like to see 4 linesmen instead of the normal 2. So that all sides of the pitch can be covered and more involved with the ref.

  16. #36
    Reserves Hither green's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S/E London
    Posts
    263
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by crc
    I hate when defenders 'shepherd' the ball out of play for a goal kick. If I had the power (lovely power!), I'd call that obstruction unless the defender actually touched the ball (in which case he wouldn't let the ball just roll out of play!)

    This rule would be similar in its ethos to the back-pass rule - the idea being to keep the ball in play.
    At last, someone else who gets annoyed by defenders obstructing play. After diving, "shepherding the ball out of play" is my biggest bugbear. I'm sure there's already a rule on obstructing, it's just never used for those instances and bl00dy well should be. It's supposed to be entertainment afterall, so the rules should give the attackers the advantage.

    The one thing I wouldn't introduce is the sin-bin. It smacks of a minority sport to me, we'll be having time-outs next.
    "...and it's Charlie Chaplin on the wing..."

  17. #37
    First Team Bald Student's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,824
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Linesmen in football are only ever linesmen.
    Touch judges in rugby are also referees and they alternate between the jobs. The touch judges have much more influence in rugby than linesmen in football and much more off the ball incidents are dealt with.

  18. #38
    Reserves Hither green's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S/E London
    Posts
    263
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bald Student
    Linesmen in football are only ever linesmen.
    Except for when they're "assistant referees"
    "...and it's Charlie Chaplin on the wing..."

  19. #39
    Capped Player
    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,333
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,737
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,827
    Thanked in
    1,928 Posts
    Top of my list, is an easy one.
    From an experiment in the Brasilian league.
    The Ref carries a white spray can in his back pocket, used after a free kick is awarded to mark the distance a defense wall should line up behind and in one stroke eliminate all that farce of a ref lining up the wall the required distance, the wall transgressing etc. Gives unquestioned authority to the ref. I only saw it used in two games, it worked superbly.

  20. #40
    First Team ken foree's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Location
    newton, massachusetts
    Posts
    1,176
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    26
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    22
    Thanked in
    17 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple stu
    A free in the box can only be given for an indirect free-kick offence - backpass and obstruction being the main ones. I don't think there are many "unintentional fouls" as you define them - they may fall under the heading of "He was stupid to dive in like that", in which case penalty.
    hear you re: handball. funny i was thinking about this only yesterday watching psg-marseille (dire). there was a big shout at the end for a peno where a psg forward had dribbled just inside the area and pushed the ball to one side of a defender.. it looked as if he might lose control and the defender stood his ground when they collided. it was a real 6 of one situation; the forward's path to goal was impeded (crashed to the ground, chance lost), but the defender had his hands in the air as if to say "he's barging into me, i'm not at fault!" no peno given obviously, which woulda been very harsh. but as you put it, "obstruction" could perhaps be more widely applied in these in-between cases?

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Rule Changes
    By noddy102 in forum Premier & First Divisions
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 27/01/2011, 3:49 PM
  2. Rule 34
    By renovater in forum Junior League
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08/03/2007, 6:40 PM
  3. Don't Rule us out!!
    By candystripedkid in forum Derry City
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 20/12/2003, 9:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •