Quotewould people read what was actually written?
and ignoring that, we put up with years and years of stadium and financial related abuse from the pox, why should we not gloat now the shoe is most certainly on the other foot?
Do i read the accounts correctly? 400k & 300k loses in last 2 years? How long can Bohs survive before they need to breakeven? How can they pay off their debts?
would people read what was actually written?
and ignoring that, we put up with years and years of stadium and financial related abuse from the pox, why should we not gloat now the shoe is most certainly on the other foot?
Well Longford Town do have a limited company. It's still an active company on the CRO, albeit with overdue returns. People should make up their minds about what their giving out about - Tax, Accounts, Registered Companies or Licencing...
Only thing that anyone can say with certainty is that we've overdue accounts with the CRO, as we have tax clearance (as per "well connected" longfordian), have an active registered company (as per the CRO), and the audited accounts will be with the licencing body once they manage to send them to the right address (as per the boards excuse for no licence).
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
Proof that they are unincorporated? None that I'm going to post here, but tell you what, ask shels and longford for their company number.Originally Posted by Rogue Trader
Both have company's registered in the club name that are effevtively holding companies, ie not the ones who pay the wages.
All I'm asking for is for the same transparencey that all the other clubs have to endure, so we know we're on the same footing.
I dont know if this is a case of Poachers turned Gamekeepers or The Lunatics taking over the asylum. but feck sake you've a nerve to moan about transparencey given rovers muddied past
It was FAI rules that meant that had to be the case. Members clubs had to have a registered company. So to comply with FAI rules we have to have the registered holding company, but to comply with Thomas' transparency rules we have to ditch it?
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
Dont tempt me.
We can debate rationally here but when a dumbass comes in with drivel he rightly gets abused
KOH
Where was there a lack of transparency in what happened at rovers?
Macy you miss the point, the trading part of the club should be a company, not a club. That way every club will have the same obligations (and protections) under company law. Thats not the case at the moment.
If the assets are held by one company and the trading entity is another company there's no problem with that. Even simpler is the Bohs situation, a company limited by guarantee which allows for members to subscribe etc.
I would think that will happen in the future, just exactly when I don't know though.
Upwards to the vanguard where the pressure is too high.
EL Football clubs need to be efficient and effective operations off the field far more than their teams need to be any ephin use on the field. Success in football is often a temporary phenomenon on the field which last sometimes only a few seasons. Proper practices need to be adopted and implemented at all current 22 EL clubs and any future clubs involved at any level of senior professional/semi-pro level on the entire Island every season into the future!
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks