Jason Byrne now on again - Set to sign in Jan

Originally Posted by pete

Bray are probably comfortable as they don't show any ambition.

Says a supporter of a team that has let 3 of the best young players in the league walk away for just over €100,000 combined. Bray have nearly got that off Shels for Byrne already....

and that fact that we got nearly for for loaning Zayed out for just 8 weeks as well..........

Originally Posted by Macy

Says a supporter of a team that has let 3 of the best young players in the league walk away for just over €100,000 combined. Bray have nearly got that off Shels for Byrne already....

Exactly! Cork ego once again!

Originally Posted by pineapple stu

I refuse to believe any eL club can clear that much debt that quickly.

We did, it's quite simple really. From €2.8m to €0 in the space of time it takes a judge to bang his gavel.

KOH

Originally Posted by WeAreRovers

We did, it's quite simple really. From €2.8m to €0 in the space of time it takes a judge to bang his gavel.

KOH

Rofl!

Originally Posted by bigmac

Yeah, perhaps the real point of warning is that in most cases, a 50% sell on clause could turn out to be worthless as it realistically acts as a deterrent to selling someone on.

That's an excellent point imo. A smaller clause in future for any club could get you more money as with 50% it's going to take an absolutley huge offer for Shels to let him go, and in other cases with a clause that big it would be a similar story. The clause being so big could ultimately cost you alot of money.

no you see its all about shels being too stingey and not letting jayo go onto bigger and better things..theres no two ways about it..that waster ollie byrne messed up a big move for jayo.if anyone deserved it it was him,and some big fat mess got in the way of that,im sure jayo "accepted" it well..

Yeah we should have let him go on a free if anyting. Paid for his flights over and threw a big going away party for him. Sure we don't want to stand in his way.

Originally Posted by Slash/ED

Yeah we should have let him go on a free if anyting. Paid for his flights over and threw a big going away party for him. Sure we don't want to stand in his way.

now your just being a stupid shels fan..im sure if you asked him he'd tell you what he'd want to do..and thats leave and go...

I don't care if he wants to go, we're not a f*cking charity. If he wants go he'll wait until we agree a fee like every footballer at a club not in Ireland.

Is anybody with me in thinking that Shels have been punished for their own short sightedness / lack of ambition.

A 50% sell-on clause is an outrageous clause to agree to and it suggests to me that when Shels signed Byrne they were of the opinion that he would not ever be worth a huge heap of money.

Therefore they were probably thinking they were "doing" Bray at the time by offering 50% of nothing, as they saw it, instead of a bigger transfer fee.

I'd say it was more a case of Byrne being chased by pratically every club in the league so had all the power in the negociations.

Originally Posted by pete

Bray are probably comfortable as they don't show any ambition. They have massive catchment area in south dublin & have as much potential as most dublin clubs. The Carlisle grounds haven't been improived in 10 years either so 100k might have bought at roof or replaced the grass with concrete...?

And they took a point home from Cork last season so should be thrown out of the league for holding a bigger club back.

Originally Posted by pete

Bray are probably comfortable as they don't show any ambition. They have massive catchment area in south dublin & have as much potential as most dublin clubs. The Carlisle grounds haven't been improived in 10 years either so 100k might have bought at roof or replaced the grass with concrete...?

In 10 years????? You must be joking! Nearly 90 years....just ask Michael Collins.

Originally Posted by Vitruvian Man

Is anybody with me in thinking that Shels have been punished for their own short sightedness / lack of ambition.

A 50% sell-on clause is an outrageous clause to agree to and it suggests to me that when Shels signed Byrne they were of the opinion that he would not ever be worth a huge heap of money.

Therefore they were probably thinking they were "doing" Bray at the time by offering 50% of nothing, as they saw it, instead of a bigger transfer fee.

Agree with that. Byrne was not sold cos oily couldnt stomach handing over €200,000 to Bray. In effect this would mean that Byrne will not be going anywhere and his career will not progress cos oily wont part with 50%. Truly he is scum.

KOH

Yes he is scum for not selling the best palyer in the eL for a paltry €200,000

Originally Posted by Raheny Red

Yes he is scum for not selling the best palyer in the eL for a paltry €200,000

He's scum cos he's holding back Byrnes career.


KOH

NY Hoop wrote:

He's scum cos he's holding back Byrnes career.

If I was in Oily's shoes I'd do the same. If I had the chance to hold back the best player in the eL I'd do it at all costs!!

I want the best for Shels not the best for one player!!

Originally Posted by Raheny Red

Yes he is scum for not selling the best palyer in the eL for a paltry €200,000

He'd be selling him €400,000. It's because of the deal Byrne signed that shels would only make €200,000 - that's his fault only.

Originally Posted by Macy

He'd be selling him €400,000. It's because of the deal Byrne signed that shels would only make €200,000 - that's his fault only.

Something which is entirely irrelevent to the discussion, Olly values Byrne higher than 200,000 ergo he is scum. Good lord I love foot.ie.