Youd wonder what the margin is on a kids kit at €50 euro that they all seem to be. Prime candidate for a loss leader for the clubs youd think
Youd wonder what the margin is on a kids kit at €50 euro that they all seem to be. Prime candidate for a loss leader for the clubs youd think
3/10 First Division clubs without a main sponsor on their kits at today’s League launch (Athlone, Longford & Wexford). Not a great look so close to the season. Anyone know if they will be sorted by opening week?
We haven't had one for a while. It actually is literally a great look as the kits look so much better but I know what you mean.
The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand..
Anyone know why that is? Is it just a trendy thing to do now? Roma are the same and I think Chelsea too.
I was worried last year that Bishopgate might be pulling out or something and that was the reason for their absence, but I guess not?
I like a good sponsorless jersey anyway, much cleaner. Very rarely does a sponsor enhance a jersey
I'm guessing in our case they may have reduced the money they're spending, and the ground name sponsorship probably gives better value for money given we're not going to be on TV or have pictures of the shirt in the media very often. For the likes of Roma and Chelsea I presume they're holding out for more money than they're being offered currently.
The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand..
Bookmarks