He addressed the Greenwood thing in the Virgin Media and RTE interviews, that should be the end of it.
Its really not that complicated!!!
Yeah, I think the Greenwood thing has been adequately dealt with now. He never picked him or even had the option to, so it's a non story really. Same goes for the timings questions, save those for Canham by all means and hold him to account, but it's not adding anything by asking the manager further about it. I'm more interested in hearing about his backroom staff and his thoughts on Irish players in future interviews, once he's had a chance to get his feet under the table.
I liked how he acknowledged that previous management had left a good foundation in terms of young players already with international experience. I understood that change will be incremental rather than sudden and that he’ll build on the good things already in place – and by implication improving the bad things. It seems like he has seen and understands what he’s inheriting. I was wondering if he’d be more Charlton-like who had a very particular project in mind.
That said, I seem to remember Iceland being very rigid without the ball (at Euro 2016 anyway), two perfectly straight banks of four that were just immovable.
I liked how he said he’s flexible on formation and I thought his comment about small margins deciding games at this level was quite astute. Many of Kenny’s games were decided at the margins, almost always in our opponents’ favour! Win the big moments, you win the big games.
It's far from dealt with - effectively they tried to brush his role in this under the carpet in a rather ineffectual way, blaming the Jamaican FA and saying that 'I absolutely don't approve of his (Greenwood's) actions' - this is not an explanation - it is a corporate fluff piece designed to facilitate the media in saying he has addressed the issue.
Hallgrimsson actively pursued Greenwood in March 2024 - if he wasn't he would not have met him in an effort to recruit him. He now claims that he gave a political answer about his comments then - comments where he portrayed Greenwood as the victim, claimed that Greenwood had suffered trauma and that he deserved a second chance (let him without sin ...). This is not a political answer to a question - it is an attempt to whitewash the allegations against Greenwood in order to clear a path for Greenwood to declare for Jamaica.
A 'political answer' would have been for Hallgrimsson to say something like - 'I utterly abhor and condemn all acts of domestic and gender based violence and I give my full support to all survivors of such violence. While I recognise that the player mentioned in reports has had all charges against him dropped, I cannot, with a clear conscience, consider including a player with multiple accusations of gender based violence against them in past in any squad that I coach' - that would have been a 'political answer' and one which would have eliminated any issue of his attitude towards Greenwood.
However - while he was asked to 'clarify' his comments on Greenwood - it is notable that he was not asked about how he oversaw for six years a culture in the Islandic squad that saw multiple allegations of rape and gender-based violence against multiple members of the squad - allegations that ultimately saw the entire Board of the Islandic FA resign in 2021 because it engaged in a systematic cover-up of the allegations. Furthermore - in the aftermath of the allegations of abuse against female footballers that emerged two days before this appointment - the FAI should be asked if they made any attempt to find out from Hallgrimsson about his knowledge and his role from 2013-1028 while the rumours of rape and violence by players in his squad were circulating in Iceland.
Prepared to give the man a chance to prove his worth as a manager.
But IMO the timing of this is yet another major PR disaster by the FAI, we go 10 months with no manager constantly hearing a appointment is close then in the days leading up to two major games for the ladies team they decide to announce the appointment of the new mens' senior manager. Also in the wake of news of the abuse allegations by male FAI coaches within the ladies, their appointment ia a man who has spoke in what many would see as support of a player who has also faced abuse allegations of a partner.
54 Crew-Finn Harps FC Supporters Club
Following Harps Home & Away
https://www.facebook.com/54CrewFHFC
It just seems like you are trying to stir **** here to be honest. He was asked about it, he answered the question to say the approach came from the Jamaican FA, not him. If they dispute that it would be re-opened but, as of now, they haven't, so I doubt we'll hear any more about it unless that changes.
I have no idea why you think he should be asked about the thing in Iceland, to the best of my knowledge there is no suggestion that it has anything at all to do with him. Clearly there was an issue at board level there that was subsequently dealt with, if it involved him in any way I'm sure that would have emerged at that point.
To be honest it comes across as though you're just trying to stir things because he is the manager and it's not your pick Chris Hughton.
there will always be something the announcement will clash with so never a good time. hardly a "PR disaster" to be fair!! its not as if it was announced on the actual day of the womens game itself.
Id actually argue that the announcement of the men's manager has brought peoples attention back to irish international football, including the womens matches, with the euros being on. It had hardly registered with me that the womens team match against england was on tonight until a couple of Irish international football stories popped up this week.
As JRG said his comments regarding Greenwood went deeper than what he talked about in the press conference. Comments where he showed sympathy towards what he has been through as if Greenwood was the victim in all this.
So don't think JRG is **** stirring whatsoever and actually surprised that someone didn't ask further questions at the press conference.
He was asked about it in the press conference, and also by VM Sport and RTE. Possibly in the print media session as well. So he's answered it a few times now. I just don't think there's a lot more to add. He's said he doesn't condone anything the player did, and he never capped him or picked him in a squad, so what else are you expecting him to say? Should we ask him his position on the Icelandic Cod Wars as well while we're at it? Or should we maybe just be focusing more on his views in respect of the Ireland team...
I like the way he talks football - inc. that line about not starting from zero every time. Seems grounded and sensible.
I simultaneously dislike both 'ethicists on the ditch' (too easy, hindsight 20/20 and no one could ever match their moral standards) AND the macho/laddish culture in and around football. I hope he is not one of the lads in that sense. Can we say the same for culture within the the FAI? (Innocent question as I have no clue.) I think it needs a little more clarification on his part -nothing a decent PR team couldn't handle- but while keeping in mind that he has never been accused of anything himself.
Logged in to have a look at the reaction to the Hallgrímsson appointment, just read the 1st page and was reminded why I hadn't logged in since the Willy Sagnol 'discussion'.
I’d much rather we just focus on the football and this guys capabilities as a manager and leave these irrelevant side-notes alone. There’s none of us that never said or did anything wrong, so we’d be better off to stop trying to demand that standard from our football manager.
Drop the Chris Hughton nonsense - in purely footballing terms Hallgrimsson deserves a chance. This is not about his footballing ability - it is about his role and attitude relating to very serious cases of gender based violence against women.
Unfortunately the reality is that Hallgrimsson did not provide an adequate answer about why he made the comments he did about Greenwood - his response was a corporate PR exercise, attempting to put the blame on the Jamaican FA and ignore the fact that he met with Greenwood and then his comments portrayed Greenwood as a victim.
Throughout his period of involvement with the Icelandic team rumours were circulating about the violence perpetrated by squad players against women - the gang rape of a woman in 2010 and the sexual assault and attempted strangulation of two women by another prominent player in 2017, being the most high profile of the accusations at the time. An investigation by the Icelandic government stated that there was a culture within the squad throughout the 2010s that violence against women was acceptable - a squad that Hallgrimsson was first assistant manager and then manager between 2013-2018. It lacks credibility that, given leading members of the Icelandic FA were aware of what had happened and covered-up the allegations, that senior members of the management team would not have some inkling with regards to the allegations - the 2017 allegations were reported both to the police and to the Icelandic FA when the violence happened.
Now - if Hallgrimsson had no knowledge of these allegations then fair enough - but in my view, if he doesn't make a statement on it then he should receive strenuous questioning by reporters and he needs to outline how he was unaware of these allegations when rumours existed and in 2017 both the police and the Icelandic FA had full knowledge of the allegations against an Icelandic player. On top of that - he really does need to drop the corporate PR act about Greenwood, put his hand up and say 'I was wrong to do what I did and to say what I did'.
Remember - the FAI appointed Hallgrimsson two days after several female footballers made very serious allegations against FAI coaches, demonstrating once again that those who lead the FAI have their head buried in the sand when it comes to the issue of the safety of female players and the threat of gender-based violence against female players.
I think what the big red guy is saying is all fair, I also understand the view of others who want to move on and enjoy something for once, just be weary of taking this stuff lightly is all I'd ask. I certainly don't aim to downplay it, I've already said my own piece early in the topic and have nothing further to add about it all.
In other news, an terview about HH for anyone interested. I haven't even watched it myself yet, maybe some questions will be answered courtesy of Raf![]()
Last edited by Acornvilla; 12/07/2024 at 6:32 PM.
I will post about the variety of allegations surrounding HH once, and once only, unless the known facts change.
Mason Greenwood: This is the most significant allegation for me. It's difficult because on one hand the audio recording was stark, but on the other hand the case against him was dismissed and in theory he is entitled to be treated with a presumption of innocence.
He was definitely attempting to pass the buck to the Jamaican FA with the answer he gave earlier in the year.
I would like to know the context in which he was asked the question. It would be good to know if it was a pre approved question in a sit down interview or if it was sprung on him in a press conference? It reads more like the latter than the former, and I can see why he would want to give an answer that doesn't close of any options in that situation.
Historic Icelandic allegations: Some of the historic allegations I've seen mentioned regarding this go back to 2010, long before he was involved with their men's national team.
There is a serious accusation against Kolbeinn Sigþórsson from 2017. That seems to have been dealt with at the time in the Icelandic FA by Gudni Bergson rather than HH. There was no police action so I doubt it would have come across the managers desk beyond their FA briefly making him unavailable for selection while it was looked in to.
The initial allegations against Gylfri Sigurdsson were incredibly serious, but IIRC it eventually emerged that he was the victim of an elaborate blackmail scam and he immediately went to the police explaining what had happened.
In every case the allegations aren't that he did anything wrong in his own personal conduct, but that he might have handled things better. With the benefit of hindsight he might have done a few things differently , but at the same time none of his actions seem to have been totally unreasonable under the circumstances.
The timing with what is going on in the FAI is obviously unfortunate, but that's the FAI as usual.
Damian Duff: His comments are unsurprising, but I haven't been able to find anything where he talks about the HH appointment directly.
He's criticising the FAI for their obvious faults. It's well established what they are. Things are better than the were under John Delaney, but there's still a long way to go.
But while saying these things he was obviously itching for his old mate John from his playing days to get the job. John O'Shea was grossly unqualified to even be in the interim position he was in, but Duffer wanted him to be given the full time gig, presumably because he's an old friend. Damian was a much more credible candidate himself but made it incredibly clear he wouldn't consider taking the job.
That's exactly the sort of mutual back-scratching bull**** the FAI are famous for. Duffer wants to run with the fox and the hounds on this. It'll be difficult to take anything he says in future terribly seriously TBH.
Greenwoods Mrs happy to stay with him, got pregnant since and by all accounts they are happy. He's still employed in football and chances are a big club will buy him for big money this summer. Never been convicted of anything. Some of the stories over the years of our ex internationals treatment of women make you fall off your chair so I think if Greenwoods partner has forgiven him Hallgrimsson making a comment about trying to recruit him for the Jamaican team is completely irrelevant and quiet honestly I genuinely don't understand why it's even a story.
It's not the same as Sagnol thinking white players more intelligent than Africans, that's a belief he holds. And it's definitely not the same as Lennon threatening to slit the throat of his mistress.
This seems like a good appointment from a football standpoint and the tone on here as per usual is doom and gloom
Its really not that complicated!!!
Bookmarks