Déjà vu all over again.
We concede to long range strikes time and time and time again, yet Kenny doesn't seem to think it an issue, effectively putting it down to bad luck.
It isn't simply misfortune; we are susceptible to these sorts of goals because of the way we are set up defensively.
It has now become clear that opposition teams have identified this and are actively praying on this obvious weakness. Yet, incredibly, no action is taken by the management to rectify this glaring flaw.
What money on our allowing multiple long range strikes on our goal again against the Dutch? And we'll likely concede from one, too.
And, again, we'll no doubt have Ireland fans talking about 'unstoppable worldies' and how 'he'll never hit a better one - no goalkeeper is saving that'. As if it isn't an absolutely regular occurrence.
Put myself through the highlights on Virgin Media last night & the long range goals obviously came up, Damien Delaney saying our CB line in those particular situations as they develop is too deep which pulls the DMs back also to stay compact thus leaving the shooting space, said he thinks teams are aware of it and playing for it at this stage knowing it will come. Richard Dunne was next to him and didn't disagree. Two men who would have an idea where to be standing you'd imagine. He said also the focus seems to be purely to get behind the ball in numbers but stops there & obviously that doesn't cut it.
Its no secret that we are susceptible to the long range strikes/worldies and i think the criticism and analysis from the likes of Delaney and folks on here is fair. I just dont think that the goal last night is a good example of us getting it wrong. Especially if you compare to the ones we conceded to Armenia, Luxembourg or Azerbaijan which are textbook examples of how we leave ourselves exposed. I thought the defense had set up pretty well last night given where the ball was with Mbappe - he just happened to lay it off impeccably and the strike was a no touch beauty, both of which gave neither Stevens nor Duffy time to break their shadow effectively.
Someone who knows more than me, how could that have played out differently?
& all fair enough too & in isolation probably right, but a TV talking head paid to fill space isn't going to ignore the fact we have conceded another goal along a very similar fault line either. As long as it keeps happening it'll remain a topic even if goals like that can just happen when against players of Frances calibre.
The manager doesn't see it as a live issue is my read, he's dismissive of it whenever he's asked, so a problem you don't see as a problem isn't one you'll give time to.
The problem is that no matter who was the manager they were going to have to bring through all of these kids - the Irish squad under O'Neill had gone over the hump age-wise.
The next manager selected will be a crucial decision - because we have some talent coming through and we need someone with the ability to bring that talent along as a team and also have the football know-how to adapt when necessary.
I don't agree - we are playing prettier football - but is it really any more effective. If you want to pass the ball you have to do so with the objective for penetrating and making chances.
Particularly in the second half last night France didn't even get out of second gear - they had no need to - and despite everything we basically created on half-chance. So while we had a team committed to the cause and they played their hearts out - we are nowhere close where we need to be to qualify for a tournament - and we are in danger of wasting the young talent that is potentially coming through unless there is a bullseye when the next guy is appointed (and I have no idea who that should be - Lee Carsley seems to be the best option at the moment from what I can see).
Shows Kenny's ineptitude
That he is still learning his job and we don't know if he is any good.
I am thinking back to when Rooney was getting praise for the job he was doing at Derby - yet the person really running the show was Liam Rosenior
The one big area of concern is midfield - Cullen, Molumby and Browne do not inspire any confidence - we have goalkeepers, defenders and attackers - but we are very short of potential midfielders - I really cannot see the argument against playing either Collins or Omobamidele in midfield (or both of them if we continue to have a derth in midfield and CBs continue to come through). Hopefully Moran makes it and then we have to hope for the likes of Hodge, Gilsenen, Vata, Bloxham, the kid at Arsenal et. al. to develop.
Re Collins and btw good shout on omobamidele. there is no argument.
Obviously we would like them in defence if we had top midfield players
But we don't we really don't.
Austria used alba in midfield when he was playing in defence for Bayern Munich. They did it because they needed him in midfield.
My guess is Collins is slightly more suited to DM but omobamidele might be pretty good too.
Cullen is our only midfield player of international standard. Molumby is inconsistent and he's a lunatic. I've no idea how he doesn't get more cards
Knight is good at everything very good at nothing.
They aren't going to add what the midfield lacks though. They might be technically decent enough to survive in the DM role but they aren't going to add the creativity or guile further forward lads and its that we're missing.
Jury out on whether Cullen could be reasonably described as international standard too, he's as good as we have but that's about it.
To be fair to Cullen his current colleagues in midfield make his job ridiculous difficult.
You've right about the link player between midfield and Ferguson
Basically we need Wes back!
We might have to see if smallbone or McGrath can do it until someone else's pops up
I would like to try Mickey Johnson there in a friendly. Might work might not but we have to think outside the box to survive
Alba was a midfielder by trade that Bayern converted into a defender. Same with Philipp Lahm. Pep didn't have a brain wave by suddenly thinking one day this lad could play midfield. He could play midfield because he played there coming through the ranks and was a world class player. It's what Bayern do. They play midfielders in defence so players become versatile. Joshua Kimmich another midfielder they've played in defence.
Irish defenders playing in midfield, my bet would have been Coleman. Think Coleman would have taken to midfield because of his game intelligence.
Jonathan Afolabi and Sinclair Armstrong both called up to the senior squad.
That'll keep the Dutch staff up the next two nights.
No Somos muchos pero estamos locos.
Since the beginning of 2021, 11 of the goals we've conceded have come from long distance strikes - roughly half of the goals scored against us in that time.
Taken in isolation, you could say every one of those goals was 'a unstoppable worldie', 'simple bad luck', 'an unbelievable, once in a lifetime hit', or whatever. But, looked on collectively in overview, it's obvious we have a problem. 'Don't get fixated' said Kenny, when asked about the issue.
But, accept it or not, this is symptomatic of the way the team is organised defensively and a recurring issue that has yet to be properly addressed by the management.
Paul McGrath was a centre-back with dodgy knees that Jack Charlton converted into arguably one of the best midfielders for a couple of years.
I think the potential of both Collins and Omobamidele is underestimated as possible midfielders - for different reasons - Collins is capable of taking the ball and running with it - Omobamidele has a low centre of gravity and is good at reading the game. Having one or both in midfield frees up the wing players - wing-backs and wingers to get forward.
Bookmarks