Anybody know if there's any difference between plasma screens and plasma tv's???
Someone suggested that the only difference is that a plasma screen can be used with a computer, while a plasma tv can't. Anyone got any other ideas?
Anybody know if there's any difference between plasma screens and plasma tv's???
Someone suggested that the only difference is that a plasma screen can be used with a computer, while a plasma tv can't. Anyone got any other ideas?
The glass isn't half full or half empty it's just too damn big!
If they said it exactly like that they're a blowhard, "plasma screen" is just a synonym for "plasma tv". That being said, although plasma displays for computing are still relatively rare, displays designed for TV won't work well with computers, and vice versa. Just like LCD displays and LCD TV's. Computers and televisions just work differently currently - different resolutions, etc - although that'll change in time and they'll converge.
adam
We have a Plasma screen at work - its not a Plasma TV as it does not have a TV Tuner.
To watch TV on it, you'd have to attach an external tuner (like a VCR).
Maybe thats the difference? Essentially they are are the same thing though.
TV in this country is PAL, which has 625 lines.
Computer monitors have a 1,000 lines, which is why computer monitors always flicker when seen on TV.
The "lines" I refer too are the number of horizontal lines laid out from top left to bottom right of a screen to make up the picture.
I thought LCD was the future now. Plasma old technology?
I always thought that the flicker was because the refresh rate of the computer monitor and the sampling rate of the camera were not in sync rather than the variation in the horizontal line number.Originally Posted by patsh
don't worry, they couldn't hit an elephant at this dis......
LCD came long before plasma, it just wasn't applied to televisions in the mainstream because they couldn't be produced at a mid-market prices. (Plasma's are traditionally priced for the luxury market, LCD's aren't good enough to sell in that market.) With the switch in the computer market to LCD, they became produced in large enough numbers to test the television market. Plasma's are coming down in price somewhat now for much the same reason (production numbers).Originally Posted by pete
What dcfc said about the TV tuner, although as I said there are important configuration differences also, such as screen resolution. TVs traditionally default to much lower resolution, resolutions that would be uncomfortable on a computer these days. Obviously with modern televisions and technologies (HDTV), this is changing.
What Jim said about refresh rates.
adam
Last edited by dahamsta; 11/07/2005 at 11:28 AM.
Also, it is only recently that LCD technology allowed them to make LCD tv's in larger screen sizes at 'affordable' prices.
Now, what I want to know, is which is better - LCD or plasma?
Plasma will give you a better picture, but it may not last as long as an LCD. It'll be a lot more expensive too. And you don't want one near the ground if there's kids about, it'll burn the finger off them.
adam
so whats the different technology used then? Also, what are the screens they have in pubs, plasma?
I'm a bloke,I'm an ocker
And I really love your knockers,I'm a labourer by day,
I **** up all me pay,Watching footy on TV,
Just feed me more VB,Just pour my beer,And get my smokes, And go away
Most screens in pubs are plasma, apart from projected of course. HowStuffWorks will answer the hardcore technology questions far better than me.
http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/lcd.htm
http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/plasma-display.htm
adam
I have a 48 inch High Definition wide screen plasma TV. It's the real deal. Here in the US, they're cheaper than LCD (set me back $3k though) and while LCDs are thinner, to me the quality of picture is the same. Plus some LCDs suffer from the 'burn' problem where some individual pixels burn out over time.
BTW, has HD technology reached over there yet? There are rumours that the 2006 World Cup will be broadcast in HD.
Last edited by Metrostars; 11/07/2005 at 2:40 PM.
"Jacques Santini...will be greeted in every dugout of the country by "one-nil, one-nil" - Clive Tyldsley, 89th minute of France-England June 13, 2004.
"Ooooohhhh Nooooooo" Bobby Robson 91st minute.
At last! A solution to the finger prints everyone else seems to leave on my monitorOriginally Posted by dahamsta
![]()
don't worry, they couldn't hit an elephant at this dis......
Bookmarks