LSL shouldn't be given the opportunity to vote. If the FAI are serious about footballing reforms they need to enforce calendar season across the board.
https://kesslereffect.bandcamp.com/album/kepler - New music. It's not that bad.
The effective third tier being run at a completely different time to the first and second tiers can quite rightly be described as an "almighty mess" in fairness.
Across the water, U23 teams have competed in the EFL Trophy. That was controversial enough but more acceptable for EFL clubs than U23 teams joined League One and League Two.
U23 teams in England then compete in a separate league with relegation to test them in that environment.
The First Division as we know have been completely against the idea of second teams joining the division. A third tier can be a blank canvas opportunity to form a "Second Division". Allow second teams (U23) but with the stipulation that they cannot be promoted to the First Division. Second teams can have a stipulation that at least 5 outfield players are U23. Third level institutions that aren't part of the youth leagues can similarly be granted an U23 licence.
Example "Second Division":
Carlow Kilkenny*
Cavan Monaghan*
Kildare*
Mayo*
Shamrock Rovers U23
UCC U23
UL U23
NUIG U23
* Only these first teams can be considered for promotion to the First Division.
https://foot.ie/forums/117-Kerry-FC
A Championship: 4 years - 8 first teams - 0 financially ruined. First Division '14: 7 first teams.
Opportunity lost for new clubs/regions to join the LoI family.
I disagree with not allowing promotion to division 1 for reserve teams.
Why on earth would Rovers or any of the other teams have the expense of running a team in the 3rd division where the standard would be very weak by definition and you have no hope of advancement.
Promotion to the Premier division should be out for Rovers or any other reserve team but if UCC or UL or NUIG are good enough to be promoted what makes them different from UCD?
Why did Shamrock Rovers previously enter the First Division when no promotion was available?
An U23 licence should be granted for any level below the First Division. If UCC or UL or NUIG want to earn promotion to the First Division, they'll have to qualify for a First Division licence instead of an U23 licence. That should require joining the youth leagues.
https://foot.ie/forums/117-Kerry-FC
A Championship: 4 years - 8 first teams - 0 financially ruined. First Division '14: 7 first teams.
Opportunity lost for new clubs/regions to join the LoI family.
https://foot.ie/forums/117-Kerry-FC
A Championship: 4 years - 8 first teams - 0 financially ruined. First Division '14: 7 first teams.
Opportunity lost for new clubs/regions to join the LoI family.
Its up to the FAI to lead not allow a few clubs veto ideas for self preservation and to try to avoid relegation..
If the FAI want the better clubs to invest in their academies they have to have a prospect of retaining talent past 19 years old.
Its harder for kids to break into Derry/Dundalk/Rovers first team at 18/19 so they need a place to play at a high standard while remaining attached to the club and training with them everyday to progress
https://foot.ie/forums/117-Kerry-FC
A Championship: 4 years - 8 first teams - 0 financially ruined. First Division '14: 7 first teams.
Opportunity lost for new clubs/regions to join the LoI family.
Is there another country in Europe that went from having a poor & disjointed pyramid to something that actually works?
oh boy I'm not good at football forums
Wales had a similarly disjointed system, largely run by local leagues, until the FAW imposed a coherent, joined-up affair from HQ:
https://www.faw.cymru/en/about-faw/d...yramid-review/
Ahem...
"In 2010-11, a "pyramid" system was introduced, with the possibility of promotion and relegation between the national league [3 x divisions each of 12 teams] and the four regional intermediate leagues..."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northe..._league_system
Another big issue here is underage structures. Currently LOI clubs are obligated to provide underage structures. Let's say after 3 or 4 years of 3rd tier, you could have 3 or 4 teams promoted into the 1st Division, and same number potentially the other way. The teams promoted have no underage structures (certainly not at national level) and those relegated stillbearing the costs of their previously compulsory underage academy structures. FAI can't even enforce a common football calendar year, what chance of them ever being able to get this away. The only way football pyramid structure can work in this country is to firstly align the seasons, and secondly go down the roD of municipal stadia jointly funded by FAI, Lottery, Govt and Private partnership. No facilities equals no meaningful future. Its a 10 year plan at a minimum and requires fully joined up thinking. I'm not hopeful
The mooted third tier can be the start of the construction of a national pyramid, separate to the senior leagues and district leagues.
LoI clubs accepted that the A Championship offered promotion for First teams only. An "A Championship" or "National League" can be created for the same purposes.
Let interested clubs and non league entities join the league, as long as they are integrated into the youth leagues as well.
I've rebranded my earlier example as follows:
Example "National League":
Carlow Kilkenny*
Cavan Monaghan*
Kildare*
Mayo*
Shamrock Rovers U23
UCC U23
UL U23
NUIG U23
* Only the best of these first teams can be considered for a promotion/relegation play-off to the First Division.
If the National League example above was to expand to more than 16 teams, it could split into an extra tier.
https://foot.ie/forums/117-Kerry-FC
A Championship: 4 years - 8 first teams - 0 financially ruined. First Division '14: 7 first teams.
Opportunity lost for new clubs/regions to join the LoI family.
54 Crew-Finn Harps FC Supporters Club
Following Harps Home & Away
https://www.facebook.com/54CrewFHFC
No offence, but that doesn't make any sense.
For the whole point about a pyramid is that it should be possible, in theory at least, for each and every member to rise from base to apex, subject only to meeting playing standards on the field, and minimum infrastructure standards off it.
Hence there should be a "level playing field" (sorry) for membership, meaning no distinctions between different types of team (Reserve teams, Further Education teams, age restrictions etc), with each member expected to live within its means according to raising revenues from the normal sources - gate receipts, sponsorship, corporate, advertising, benefactors, social clubs etc. How many of your proposed members would be up to that?
Meanwhile, if it takes such contortions to come up with a 3rd tier, where are you going to find the teams to fill a 4th, 5th or 6th tier underneath? (All of which is before you address the summer/winter conundrum, remember)
And even if you did, would all your 3rd tier teams be able or willing to accept relegation to the 4th or 5th tier, should they hit a rough patch on the field?
In the end, you can only fit so many square pegs into round holes - sooner or later you're going to have to start finding round pegs.
Sorry, but I don't quite understand this?
Or shouldn't additional tiers to the pyramid come from such resiources?
Three tiers IS a pyramid. Just a rather small one.
In order to provide square holes* for square pegs, the NIFL operates a "Premiership Development" (Reserve) league for the 12 clubs in the Premiership:
https://www.nifootballleague.com/pre...022/standings/
While 9 of the teams in the Championship who operate a reserve team are in the Championship Development league, along with 7 other leading clubs with development teams who wish to compete at that level:
https://www.nifootballleague.com/cha...022/standings/
* - Even Glenavon have a Reserve team, and Lurgan's one (s)quare hole!
Bookmarks