Micky Evans is sitting somewhere feeling very hurt right now.
Its more than paramount to how things have gone since late summer, its none of this mopey dopey 6 chess moves across the back, and its 1-2 then a chip over taking out the first block. It's clearly been something they've worked on the last 6 months. I said it reminded me of the power Cluxton gave to Dublin with his precise kickouts and the more I see it the more true that is. Its completely changed the dyamic, the ability to attack and change our play. We were so so blunt and one dimensional.Originally Posted by passinginterest
I'm a bloke,I'm an ocker
And I really love your knockers,I'm a labourer by day,
I **** up all me pay,Watching footy on TV,
Just feed me more VB,Just pour my beer,And get my smokes, And go away
Micky Evans is sitting somewhere feeling very hurt right now.
Kenny is easier say and type, than Mccarthy or Stephen.
I'm a bloke,I'm an ocker
And I really love your knockers,I'm a labourer by day,
I **** up all me pay,Watching footy on TV,
Just feed me more VB,Just pour my beer,And get my smokes, And go away
I’m not de fending Mick or criticising Kenny, but there is some wild surmising taking place here. Mick’s selections were ultra-conservative because he was competing for a place at the Euros and got us to a play-off. Kenny’s selection for that play-off was also conservative. Mick during his first tenure blooded a lot of young players and was criticised for it at the time by some, but he was appointed as a caretaker for one tournament. He was never going to start a rebuilding exercise, and to be honest if he had the results would probably have matched Kenny’s less than stella World Cup campaign. Kenny had a different mandate and is making progress, but you can’t speculate about what Mick would have done under completely different circumstances.
Under Mick, we took three points from four games with the top two seeds; never led for one minute of those games, only started playing once we went behind and the opposition stood off; and were outclassed and flattered by a 2-0 defeat in Switzerland.
Under Kenny (sorry TonyD) we took two points from those equivalent games, but were competitive in all four, and led in the two away games.
Under Mick, we took ten points from the games against Gibraltar and Georgia. We were absolutely dire in every single game. We could very easily, but for Randolph's heroics and poor finishing, have had four points. Very fine lines.
Under Kenny, we took seven points from the equivalent games. The home games were inexcusable, and a lot of our future rests on how much Kenny and the lads have learned from them.
We were 'competitive' in the group under McCarthy because of the existence of Gibraltar - a small town in Andalucía which somehow has UEFA status - and because Denmark somehow drew in Georgia. Without that result, we'd have been eliminated before the last game.
I don't think the end product was that much better under Mick, considering the putrid, eye-cancer hoofball we were playing to achieve those results.
I think while there's definitely some merit in a lot of what you're saying there, it's a stretch to say we were competitive in either game against Serbia this year. I can't remember the last team to batter us so badly home and away and we were steeped with those two results.
I just don't think you can flag Randolph's heroics against Gibraltar and Georgia and overlook how much better than us Serbia were.
As I said this was not a defence of Mick or a criticism of Kenny, I was questioning the surmising around who would or would not being playing now if Mick was in charge. He was given a very clear mandate for one campaign and that largely determined his approach to selection and tactics. It wasn’t pretty but it did get us to a play off. He may have been lucky, but his pragmatic approach was governed by the circumstances. It was always implicit that the rebuilding would be left to Kenny at the end of Mick’s campaign. I just think it’s unfair to lambast a manager who in his first stint got us to the World Cup and gave Irish fans some decent football and some great memories.
Hanging on for dear life against Serbia, with their hundreds of millions of euros worth of talent, is a bit different from doing so against Gibraltar and Georgia.
Football is so often about the big moments going for and against you. We had the rub for a good few years, with Kazakhstan away, Georgia home under Trap, and several times under O'Neill, Macedonia at home, Armenia at home. Red cards, own goals, dodgy penalties, last-minute winners, etc. We got a bit of that luck against Serbia, I admit.
But under competent management, we shouldn't be getting dragged into dogfights against those teams; looking timid in possession, not showing for the ball, resorting to long, hopeful punts - getting dragged into the type of game that could go either way, and depending on a lucky break. We should be able to pass, move, pull them out of position, grind them down, get our goals, and pull away.
The last few games have shown signs, for the first time in so many years, that we're capable of learning from our past failures, growing a pair, and asserting ourselves.
FWIW O'Neill actually got us to that playoff by finishing last in the nation's league. Every single team that was in section B was guaranteed a playoff place in the end. So if we had come last in Mick's group we would have still gotten to the playoffs.
You can look at which players he preferred though. You take out Keogh and replace with Egan (over Clark probably and Kevin Long obviously). You take out Whelan and replace with Browne (his 4th choice midfielder). You take out Brady/O'Dowda and replace with Robinson cause he liked Robinson too. You take out McGoldrick and replace with Hogan because of the lads he used (S Long, Collins, Maguire, Hogan, Connolly - he's the one in form)
I know there's plenty of chaos that happens in a campaign and he'd stumble on stuff through necessity (like every good manager does and like Kenny did with Bazunu) but that'd be the most likely team if he had, for whatever reason, continued after March 2020...
Absolutely.
But I think if you're going to be balanced about it - and this is the only quibble I'd have with your post - then I don't think you can really say we were competitive in all four against the top two teams. And Mick even got more points out of the games.
You can recognise that Staunton was a great servant to Irish football, and still think he was a clueless manager. That Brian Kerr was a great underage manager, but made huge mistakes as senior boss. Or that Trap got us the results we needed for a while, but suffered from a lack of a Plan B, and it was horribly sad and vindictive of him, to alienate Andy Reid, who ended up playing his last meaningful game for us at the age of 25. Or that MON did really well in 2015-16, but didn't have the flexibility or progressive thinking to take us further.
Refereeing decisions went against us in plenty of those games against Portugal and Serbia. If the stone wall penalty against Connolly was given against Serbia at 1-1 just before they made it 2-1, it would have been a very different game and i certainly would have backed us to get at least a point from there...
As for the home game against Serbia, they were hanging on for dear life in the last 9 minutes once we scored. i think we had 3 or 4 chances in that time. The Duffy header, the shot from Omobamidele and the 2 resulting corners, few other bits...
How the hell does the narrative that Mick got us to a playoff still exist? We were there on default even though we finished last in Nations League group under O'Neill. We finished 3rd in the last group under Mick which is what we have not ultimately done under Kenny.
The difference is that we improved throughout this group and seem to be on a upward trajectory, where as in the last group we finished atrociously. The away game in Georgia was the single most infuriating game I've watched since the Kerr home game against Israel (where I wanted to strangle the Israel keeper). We were wasting time 20 minutes into the game, and it was probably the most cowardly performance Ive seen of an Irish team.
On a different note, when Travers was picked against Serbia it was because both Randolph and Kelleher were injured. There was a debate on here at the time where some of us suggested that Bazunu would be the better choice because he was playing more regular football. When Travers was poor against Serbia he was dropped and Bazunu has taken his chances with both hands. Kenny could have gone back to Randolph when he was fit but he was brave to stick with the younger player because of how he wanted to play out from the back instead of sticking the "the more experienced player" which all of our previous managers in the last 15 years would have done. I also feel that theres still a narrative on here that some still resent it because they think that Kelleher is a better keeper. He might be, but hes not showed it yet and in my opinion at his age he should be trying to get some football somewhere. Bazunu in the meantime has become integral to this team and how we play football, even if he is only a keeper as I think I seen someone suggest above. He has also endeared himself to the fans with some of his saves and how he conducts himself. (I loved his interview on RTE before the Portugal game). Yes he may still be a little mistake prone, but at 19 hes a phenomenal talent.
I think you can probably pick a moment in most games that turns them - you don't mention how incredibly fortunate our home goal was for example, or how disinterested Portugal were in Dublin - but the overall impression of the two games v Serbia has to be one of being outplayed by a far superior technical side who had gears to spare in Belgrade.
My final word on this (It's Friday night, after all):
The best we can hope for, ever, in Irish international football is to tick all these four boxes:
- Being involved in close, tight, one-score games against the top seeds. Sometimes we're just beaten by a better team, but we need to make it hard for them. Sometimes we'll catch them on a bad day and surprise them. But lets not get thrashed.
- Avoiding close, tight games against the lower seeds, and making a comfortable, enjoyable day/night out of it, and a handy two-goal margin of victory or more. Macedonia/Malta/Estonia/Cyprus at home under Mick 1.0, Cyprus and Faroes at home under Kerr, Estonia away under Trap, etc.
- Playing a style of football that doesn't make you want to vomit blood.
- Having some kind of hope for the future, in terms of the squad's age profile - and not dreading what's coming next.
We ticked one of those boxes under Mick. We've ticked 3.5 of the boxes under Kenny.
Last edited by Supreme feet; 19/11/2021 at 7:05 PM.
OK, this attitude towards Stan's campaign has become a bit of a bugbear for me, and I wanted to make a comparison between him and Kenny (yes, yes I know - Stan had a better squad)
Stan's record against the big teams in his group: two home draws, two narrow away defeats
Kenny's record against the big teams in his group: two home draws, two narrow away defeats
Stan's record against the minnows and mediocre in his group: one embarrassing defeat, one frustrating draw, seven points
Kenny's record against the minnows and mediocre in his group: one embarrassing defeat, one frustrating draw, seven points
Stan's record against the middling teams in his group: two home wins, two away draws (both of which we led going into the last two minutes)
Kenny's record against the middling teams in his group: well, there were none, but in the Nations League we only picked up two points against Wales and Finland and failed to score (yes, yes, I know... new players, new system etc)
Now, during Stan's reign I was living in London and only got to see the second half of the Slovakia away game, but I thought we played very well in that and should have won but for our inability to close out the game (a trait that has plagued Irish teams for decades). So maybe I missed something about the campaign but based on this comparison of records, I don't see why Stan is considered a laughingstock who should have been fired after two games while Kenny is a revolutionary manager who will lead us all the way to the final of Euro 2024
Did you see the squad that Staunton had? This is the side that played against Cyprus and lost 5-2;
Kenny, Finnan, O'Shea, Andrew O'Brien (Lee 71), Dunne, Kilbane, McGeady (Alan O'Brien 80), Ireland (Douglas 83), Morrison, Keane, Duff.
I'm reading through that team almost weeping. Your comparison of records is too crude.
Because Staunton was very obviously incompetent in his team selections and tactics. And, as has been noted, he had prime Given, Dunne, Finnan, O'Shea, Andy Reid, Ireland, Duff, Robbie Keane and Doyle to work with. Actual Champions League level players.
I wrote about it in detail here (shameless self-promotion):
http://anditscomethroughhere.blogspo...ton-years.html
Also, it is completely disingenuous to set out that people are coming close to stating that "Kenny is a revolutionary manager who will lead us all the way to the final of Euro 2024." It completely and utterly weakens your point. I think this forum has been very balanced with regards to Kenny and the progress. Our improvement over the last 18 months or so has seen a lot of posters on either side - pro and anti Kenny- coming closer together in their views. Whilst there have always been posters in the middle, Since the last two rounds of fixtures, I feel like the diverging groups have converged much more in their views and I reckon there's a lot of balance on this forum on the matter of Kenny.
But, hey, if you want to use hyperbole to make your points then drive it on.
Kelleher is the better keeper, and when he plays, plays for a better club at a higher level of football. He hasn't made a single error when he's played for Ireland, not one. Unfortunately, he was injured at the wrong time. From playing football.
People constantly say he needs to play somewhere else, but that's no guarantee Kenny will use him. He probably sees his teammate Alisson who has to compete to be No. 1 for his country, or Alexander Arnold play for his club week in week out, he's one of the best right backs in the world, but his own international manager still doesn't want to know. So the answer to Kelleher really has to be more than "play somewhere else".
Randolph is not in the picture. He had his time and did a decent job, but he's just not as good as the two in front of him, and that's the way it is.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks