
Originally Posted by
Stuttgart88
The FA are keeping a very close eye on any anglos playing for us and are quick to pounce if any of them is any good. They're almost happy for us to do their groundwork for them. I also think the Irish immigrant connection isn't as strong as it used to be. Irish pubs, Irish centres etc are all closing down. The biggest mass attendees around my way are now west African.
I think there's something in the societal point above but the same changes have been evident everywhere and other countries have copped themselves on and built good structures and pathways.
I think public policy in relation to sport is a key factor. Since the establishment of the State sport policy was outsourced to the GAA. Like the Church, the GAA was essentially an arm of the government.
Any economists will recognise the term "public good". A public good is something like fresh air. You can't assign property rights to it so it won't be provided by the private sector motivated by profit. Two features that define a public good are non-excludability and non-rivalry. This means that if a good is available to one, it must be available to all, and that if a public good is consumed, its supply remains unchanged. I can buy an apple and have it myself and if I eat it it's gone. That's a private good. If there is fresh air it is available to all of us and if I breathe some in it doesn't reduce supply for others. In economics public goods are associated with "free riders", people who profit from the good's availability without paying for its use. Think of a firm polluting the air we breathe without paying a carbon tax, for example.
What other examples of public goods are there? These can be debated but intangible things like law & order, education, healthcare, social justice, national defence, a culture of R&D are usually offered as good examples.
For me, a successful national football team / successful national football system is a public good. A fully functional sports culture certainly is. This may draw ridicule but I really think so. My enjoyment of it is not at the expense of anyone else's enjoyment of it, we can share it. My enjoying it doesn't reduce the supply of it. The benefits are enjoyed by many. The benefits are often tangible: health & crime for example. Italia 90 had many intangible benefits such as national self-esteem and confidence to dream big on many fronts.
Because of the free rider effect private agents won't pay for it. The returns don't accrue directly to the investor / purchaser. Therefore the effective provision of any public good must be the responsibility of the public sector and/or the voluntary sector. Now of course in football there is ample scope for private investment (or philanthropy) but on a systemic basis it can't succeed without public investment. There's already plenty of voluntary participation but that clearly isn't enough.
There's a fine line between public sector assistance and government interference in a national association according to FIFA rules. But that's to stop dictators taking over FAs and running them by decree. In our case, an insolvent dysfunctional association could easily be rescued by the State contingent on root & branch reform, and this can easily be done at arm's length to satisfy FIFA.
We've discussed the white water rafting debacle already. We've also discussed running tracks in Dublin (using Dublin as an example of a big population centre). Where I live in NW London there are 3 within 2 miles and I think 11 within 5 miles of where I live. One of these, a municipal track, would have almost as much spectator capacity as Santry, and is a lot more modern.
But football's interaction with government has been pathetic. Even greyhounds get the kind of investment that would be a game changer for football. I was in the Poznan Sheraton the night we lost to Croatia, In the bar was Denis o'Brien, a few TDs, a few well-known Dublin bankers and developers, and Michael D and his wife. All there to enjoy the party but bar moral support from Michael D and financial support from O'Brien I'd say not one of them saw the big picture - that for this to be a frequent thing the game needs help, and the game can only get help if there's culture of investing in sport. But in Ireland that's the GAA's job.
Bookmarks