
Originally Posted by
paul_oshea
Theres a habit on this forum of exaggerating the potential of our players, and with equal measure the abillity of the opposition. Where is this thing with Mitrovic, hes being talked
about like hes a class A striker? How many goals did he have in a 3 year period at Newcastle 20? The second goal was a good finish no doubt but we all know Travers should not be
getting beaten from there. So lets keep perspective here. Tadic is a good player, but that Serbia team is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're going to get. Last
night I didn't see anything to be worried about from them. They're very consistent in performing inconsistently.
I think the biggest positive is Kennys flexibility. He really has now proven that he is willing to change and try different things, but still keeping the same press, high(er) line
and trying to pass the ball when we get it. The funny thing is last night, we picked the players pretty much we all wanted, he made the big calls, he realised what he needed to do it and did it.
THe sad irony here is all day long Duffy is going to win headers for you, and he would definitely not have gotten beaten twice yesterday. Had he been in there then I think the result would have been
different, but we can't blame Kenny for that. My hope is that 3-5-2 with everyone available is given another go, and see how we get from there. I'm not buying the thing of not enough time before last
night, kenny has had enough games and time to breed familiarity with a couple of formations and systems.
I liked molumby getting stuck in, on another day he probably would have been booked for persistent fouling, even though he was out of his depth physically at least and losing the
individual duals, he was getting niggly and fouling and interrupting their play. That goes a long way especially when you can get away with it for so long, we definitely lost the bite
in midfield when he went off. We had no one to break up their play through a foul or just get in their face, and they found more space. But you can't put 2 goals down to 2 midfielder.
Another positive for me last night was that we actually seemed to have some set-pieces worked out before hand. Granted the crossing and corners were generally poor, terrible the second half, we
still showed that stuff had been worked on. Coleman was superb last night, in that role, and as a leader, he was making so many decisive tackles. Robinson was the little bit of class up front, we could have
had a second from him, he kept winning frees and relieving pressure for us too. For me the boat is beginging to sail and Connollys trying to jump onto it. That peno, he should have controlled the ball before that
and come on the outside he was straight through, hes quite frustrating at times.
I think our biggest problem is we have players who do good things, followed by bad things. Before our first goal both Doherthy and Browne had given the ball away twice, but for the goal he starts and finishes it
like in his first goal for Ireland. We need players who are consitently giving us 100% and aren't so insconsistent with in game performances. THe good is always negated by the bad. That surely should be down
to focus and composure and a little experience to get yourself out of a tricky situation when it arises. IF we could get that from all 11 players on the pitch I'd be very happy and you start to see huge improvement
overall in our game.
The reality is though we had few chances again, we were still well down in the possession, 40% seems high for me, but in the last 10 mins they had shifted down through the gears so we could have made
up quite a bit there. I also wouldn't read too much into the 2nd goal we got, theyd taken the foot off the gas by that stage. THe next 10 mins we had nothing to show, and for the same period before the goal.
I feel very sorry for Travers, he just looked so nervous - forde hasn't had much time or isn't much good : D You'd hope he can help in that department. In the short term he's not just going to bounce back.
He's going to be affected by this, he needs to play the next game, and even half of the qatar one - if we are serious about giving him a chance.
I'm happy after last night to go back to 4-3-3 , if(3-5-2) its based on the doherty experiment hasn't worked, perhaps when he gets his confidence back, but he is offering us nothing and thats effectively why we went 3-5-2. Not that I didn't like it, but its mainly to accommodate our best players, and Doherty certainly isnt one of those, and never has been for us.
Im with ifk101, overall only real positive was Kenny overall, his attitude and flexibilty. We have to now push on from here and actually start dominating games and scoring, like lux, like qatar etc.
Bookmarks