QuoteHe should be found guilty of......crimes against music
and as for his self indulgent videos argh
Now I see breaking news and ALLEGATIONS of the same thing against Georgie Best.
Is the world gone mad???
Only the jury know enough to pass a decision.
I don't know why people feel they have to adapt some sort of a stance on these things whether it be innocent or guilty.
The jury are the only ones to have seen all the evidence.
City definetly have the best bands playing at half-time.
O'Bama - "Eerah yeah, I'd say we can alright!"
G.O'Mahoney Trapattoni'll sort ém out!!
He should be found guilty of......crimes against music
and as for his self indulgent videos argh
Now I see breaking news and ALLEGATIONS of the same thing against Georgie Best.
Is the world gone mad???
Whilst they were waiting for Wacko to get to the Santa Monica courtroom so the verdict could be announced, Sky News had quite a long interview with one of the fans there, who I would put money on as having a Derry accent. Didn't give his name or show his face though - probably at his own request....Originally Posted by anto eile
Jackson will end up paying for all of this one way or the other though. His credibility in the music business is shot now, and he may well have to sell Neverland and/or the Beatles back catalogue to cover his costs, given that he was broke before the trial began anyway....
He sleeps with boys. The parents of these children are well aware of this and permit him to do so. The whole thing is a sick joke.
As someone said earlier, his fans are nutters.
And I hope he never puts out another record.
Never liked his music particularly, never brought it and probably never will. He's obviously a freak and a bit weird.
However, he was found innocent by a jury of his peers, and that's good enough for me.
You'd have to wonder about the Public Prosecutor - I mean how many more dubious cases can the bitter man take against Jackson?
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
He's a sick individual, that is for sure. He sleeps with children (boys) who aren't his own. That is very worrying and he should seek help.
Read he is in 250 million dollars worth of debt. Thats a whole lot of cd sales!! Anyways lets hopefully leave this story here and hope its a long time before another "media trial" begins.
That in itself isn't a crime, however it may be viewed.
For those childrens sake, I'd be more concerned about them living with parents that would let them share a bed with grown man in those circumstances. Don't see any prosecutions for neglect...
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
Sure it's already started, with that KKK Kunt....
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
Never knew that. More problems coming his way as you said:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/inde...n-finances.xml
Fox News reports that the Bank of America has sold Jackson's loans, which total $270 million, to Fortress Investment Group, a New York-based private hedge fund. The collateral for the loans includes Mijac, which owns Jackson's song catalog, and his 50 percent stake in Sony/ATV Music Publishing, which owns the Beatles' catalog.
Jackson's lavish lifestyle, including the Neverland Ranch, and legal expenses have left him with little cash. He has been staying afloat with loans.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the situation two facts remain:-
1/ The jury were unable to convict him BEYOND ALL REASONABLE DOUBT
2/ It doesn't matter that he has been found innocent because he has been ruined either way.
After the verdict, one irate lawyer called him a "teflon abuser" on one of the US News Channels.
Why do lawyers care, they can go home and swim in the pool of cash they make off the back of all these trials. The only winners.....
that would be tom sneddon.......himself and mj go way back.
he still seethes over the outcome of his previous efforts to "nail" mj on other "settled out of court" issues.
my own opinion is he (mj) has massive self esteem problems.
The first juror to speak to the media after the verdict, said he thought Jackson had molested at least one of the boys but felt the case against him wasn't presented properly.
The man has acted in an unacceptable manner. He should not be allowed bring children to his bedroom, EVEN WITH THEIR PARENTS CONCENT.
Always look on the bright side of life
Jackson has put himself into this mess with the way he leads his life. He has been found not guilty though so people should accept that.
While I think that his behaviour in inviting children to sleep in his bed is disgraceful, I am willing to accept that he maybe thought it was a "loving" thing to do.
The thing that galls me though and has made me question all these allegations is the fact that these so called victims ( Chandler, Arviso and 1 or 2 more ) have accepted money. This calls any allegations into serious doubt.
Any parents on this board will know what I mean when I say that if I was in that situation as a Dad, I'd want him hanged never mind jailed if he'd done something to my son.
All the money in the world wouldn't change that and any parent in their right mind would NEVER accept money instead of justice.
Had Sky News on last night & as they dedicated what seemed like a whole hour of the news bulletin to Wacko they had Breaking NewsFlash at bottom of the screen "Earthquake in Chile..." then followed by "George Best arrested/released..." type headline.
Should a station have to actually display news to call itself a news station?
I am glad he's off the hook, never believed the story. But most of all because the strict law was followed: innocent till proven guilty. So this is the only right decision, as there were never concrete proves.
An ex bodyguard at Neverland declared to have seen "Michael Jackson performing oral sex on a 10 year old boy". I wonder what happened with this testimony? Eye witnesses are usually taken serious, so it must be that this person was not seen as a trustworthy person ?! Of course, an ex bodyguard is the most likely person to be approached for a false testimony...
Let's distinguish something here - Micheal Jackson is a weirdo coz he lives in a theme park, got lots of plastic surgery and goes to court in pyjamas - GUILTY!
However, those who heard all the evidence are the only ones who can comment on the statement that Michael Jackson likes little boys - NOT GULTY!
If you allow your 10-year-old boy to saty the night at a 40-year-old man's house, you're crazy! Hence, if you go to court, and look for millions, your sanity and parental skills really are out the window.
Personal opinion - if the familys had gone to court to prove MJ guilty, he probably would have been. The amount of money they were looking for though, made their claim look stupid from the start.
The glass isn't half full or half empty it's just too damn big!
i reckon a lot of the parents allow their kids to go to neverland in the hope that jackson does something to give them a reason to sue for abuse.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks