Lets simply stick to the facts, and see if that can get us a clue or not, huh? Leave the intelligent and rational stuff to me, please.
September 2023
Sept 2: Evan Ferguson scores a hattrick against Newcastle.
Sept 7: It is revealed that Ferguson has been playing through a sore patellar tendon and felt too sore to answer the call up from Ireland.
Sept 14: Evan Ferguson resumes training
Sept 16: Ferguson makes a five minute substitute appearance against Manchester United
Sept 21: Ferguson is missing against AEK
Sept 23: De Zerbi reveals Ferguson "had a temperature" which was the reason he missed the AEK game
Sept 24: Ferguson starts up front against Bournemouth
Since this (one game against AEK) is the only time Ferguson has been missing through illness and the rumours of this "glandular fever" started a month later, we have to presume that September is supposedly when Fergie had this fever.
NSC Gold content access
So in September, according to intelligent and rational discussion on North Stand Chat, Evan Ferguson suffered from glandular fever AND played four games of professional football.
I don't know any doctors, so lets use the sometimes practical tool that is ChatGPT to ask if this is even possible:
"It would be extremely difficult—if not impossible—for elite footballers to play at a high level while suffering from glandular fever. The virus (Epstein-Barr virus, EBV) causes extreme fatigue, muscle weakness, and an enlarged spleen, which poses a serious risk of rupture if subjected to physical contact."
So according to rational and intelligent discussion on Fergie missing one game through illness, Roberto De Zerbi decided to put Evan Fergusons life in danger (that spleen rupture is no good) through starting him against Bournemouth.
We can believe that. We can believe all of this nonsense. Or we can just accept the lad had a cold and missed a game. What seems most reasonable to you?
Bookmarks