My Mrs was out shopping recently with our little one who had to go the loo. There was none in the supermarket so she brought her into a cafe beside it. The staff refused to let her use it as she was not a paying customer (she's six months pregnant and the kid is 8). Needless to say my kid got caught short and I'm fuming over this!
Does anyone know if they were within their rights to do this? Or if there is any way I could (legally) get back at them? I've written to local press and they've published but without naming and shaming.
Jeez. I find this bad. I hate how this happens, as you can never find one when you need one. The Italians seem crazy at times, but they have a good law on this - you can ask in any restaurant to use the toilets, and they cannot refuse (well that's how it was when I was last there some years back).Originally Posted by Malby
So taking this issue up with a politician may be a way too.
Last edited by Frank Blue; 08/06/2005 at 12:28 PM.
i thought thats how it was here too that they were in the public domain or something but you see signs everywhere for customers use only.
If they refuse in Italy, they face a fine. I don't know why this isnt more widespread across developed countries. Are we seen as animals, unable to respect toilet facilities in restaurants, or what?i thought thats how it was here too that they were in the public domain or something but you see signs everywhere for customers use only.
(Well I have been to some restaurants and the toilet facilities have been shocking and have been eating there)
I think it might be the case here as well. Someone told me this was on Gerry Ryan a while back and thats what was said but I don't know if its true.
My councillor friend is looking into it for me. He is also checking out all their planning permissions etc
Surely you'd be better lobbying for public jacks in the shopping centre, rather than lobbying for private jacks being open to everyone? Or even lobbying the supermarket that she was actually a customer of to have public toilets in them?
Seems perfectly reasonable to me that a business that has to maintain and clean their premises only let customers use them. You wouldn't expect to be let use one of their tables to eat butty's you brought in the supermarket.
Pathetic you're even complaining on here imo, let alone getting councillors to check the planning permission.
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
I would think a private business is within its rights to refuse entry to non-paying customers even if bad publicity.
Anyone been to New York? They sell you monster size drinks & then almost impossible to get access to toilets even if a paying customer.
Toilets are really small & may require a key for them hooked onto a tray or something so you can't sell it.
Have you any kids? I'll bet not cause if it happened to any of yours you wouldn't find it pathetic.
I never said it was a shopping centre, it was a small local supermarket.
I think you're dead right Malby.
It's common decency to leave someone use the facilities, especially in the situation you describe. It's not like a pregnant woman and an eight year old were looking for toilets free of UV lights so they could shoot up ffs
Cork City: Making 'Dream Team' seem realistic since 2007.
The problem is still the supermarket. That's where your missus was a customer not the place you have the problem with.
The Cafe should be bottom of the list of complaints - the supermarket would have toilets, they just wouldn't let your missus use them despite her spending money there.
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
Ty TiktokI think you're dead right Malby.
It's common decency to leave someone use the facilities, especially in the situation you describe. It's not like a pregnant woman and an eight year old were looking for toilets free of UV lights so they could shoot up ffs
The supermarket should have let her use them too. Common decency, especially considering the circumstances. I think a decent restauranteur would have taken a sympathetic view of things too.
As I said, Italy has a law on this, so next time you are there remember that and think of this situation.
I think it's just courtesy. If someone would knock on my door and politely ask if they could use the toilet, I'd let them. Certainly if it's a pregnant woman with a little kid. I don't see why it would be very different for a restaurant. What is the world coming to?
Yes the coffee shop should have let them use their toilets. Common courtesy.
But, more importantly, YES the supermarket should have a toilet.
Things like supermarket toilets, or lack there-of, never bothered me until I had kids. Then you become very aware of toilets/baby changing areas and the state of them.
Nowadays, a baby friendly supermarket would get my vote any day, and for that I have to compliment SuperQuinn in Waterford.
Ceci n'est pas une signature
This is pretty shocking-must have been awful for your young fella and wife.
This raises questions about society as a whole-what decent person wouldn't allow a young child and pregnant mother to use a bathroom?! Amazing.
Slightly off topic, but these jacks, most notably in town (Cork), are nasty places. Do they ever fúcking clean them? Also hotspots for crime at night, i have been told.
I still don't see why the onus is on the premises where she wasn't a customer, rather than the one she was
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
It's just that even if she wasn't a customer anywhere at all, that guy in the restaurant turned away a child and pregnant mother. Unnacceptable.I still don't see why the onus is on the premises where she wasn't a customer, rather than the one she was
I agree that the other place should be sorted too though.
Could've been avoided if she'd ordered a tea or a coke or something though.
If you attack me with stupidity, I'll be forced to defend myself with sarcasm.
Jebus Macy! The Supermarket didn't have one the cafe did!! Yes I know the supermarket probably had a staff toilet but thats besides the point.I still don't see why the onus is on the premises where she wasn't a customer, rather than the one she was
The fact is she walked into a cafe were she knew there was a toilet and they refused her the use of it. I have a sneaking suspicion that they are not allowed do this.
Macy are you a PD voter by any chance?
The supermarket has toilets for its own staff. If she asked (which she probably didn't feeling awkward) they should have let her use them. My parents owned a supermarket and if someone asked them could they use they would allow. Jesus even if someone had no money and was dying of thirst they'd give them water. No one has to so pedantically follow regulations and rules as to deny a fellow human a simple amenity. That also goes for the café. Feck whether the pregnant mother and young child are paying customers or not.
Posting Permissions
Quote
Bookmarks