Have you actually anything to add to your case other than personal attacks, TL?
How do they work? Do you want to tell us?
Because everything you've said so far is misguided -
Saying he was the only applicant for the job, based on one rumour on twitter. Then suggesting a leading national sports journalist is being fed wrong information when he says something different - but no reason given on your part to disagree. As RH notes, that tweet clearly starts "If it's true..." - which means JamesDundalk (who could be you, for all we know) doesn't know either
Saying you can't compare his existing role with the new one, and then asking what his existing role is anyway
Saying a Master's in Sports Management doesn't qualify him for the role, but not saying why, and then ignoring EG's post of course description, which suggests it is a good fit
Saying you never mentioned Rovers bias, when in fact you did so here.
Saying he doesn't have the requisite business contacts (but you've given no evidence of that one way or the other)
Saying he's not up to the job because of what other people did in other roles (probably your most bizarre argument of the lot)
Saying external candidates should have been sought (but ignoring the very possible reality that the FAI could have a hiring freeze on, or indeed the fact that there were no qualified external applicants. Because who would give up a job to go work with the FAI around about now?)
Then when you can't argue that way, you turn to ad hominem arguments -
Saying I'm thick when I don't agree with you (hardly a relevant argument, I'm sure you'll agree)
Saying I'm happy with the appointment (when I never said I was)
Saying I'm throwing around insults (when I haven't been, but you have been)
Saying I don't read anything (but then you ask why I'm happy with the appointment, when I never said I was)
So you haven't brought a single logical argument to the debate - but I'm the thick one?
You haven't a ****ing clue what you're talking about, but you're still mickey swinging away in the belief that your ill-informed views are the absolute truth and everyone else must somehow be wrong.
I don't know the ins and outs of the appointment either - but then I'm not acting like I know it all.
Bookmarks