Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 6 of 23 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 452

Thread: Shamrock Rovers entering a team in Div 1 next season

  1. #101
    Seasoned Pro Nah Nah Nah Nah's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,784
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    678
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    657
    Thanked in
    387 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Martinho II View Post
    was that in the 88-89 season when we were ahead of ye? We werent no great shapes either that period as was in same boat too.
    Would have been around then alright

  2. #102
    International Prospect Martinho II's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Killashee Longford
    Posts
    9,382
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,616
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    630
    Thanked in
    536 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Nah Nah Nah Nah View Post
    Would have been around then alright
    Yeah 2015 season was the only occasion we finished above ye in the same division.
    Gary Cronin is he the right man to manage Longford Town?

  3. #103
    Reserves exiled_gufc_fan's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Ilford, E. London
    Posts
    537
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    35
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    14
    Thanked in
    7 Posts
    Statement from First Division Clubs

    https://www.instagram.com/p/B6vZP_qp...=19b8nasmvv3so

  4. Thanks From:


  5. #104
    Coach Poor Student's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    8,042
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    239
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    110
    Thanked in
    70 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by exiled_gufc_fan View Post
    Statement from First Division Clubs

    https://www.instagram.com/p/B6vZP_qp...=19b8nasmvv3so
    How can it be concurrently rationalised that B teams affect the sporting integrity of the LOI but not the LSL?

    Interesting that the clubs want four rounds of fixtures as opposed to three. If the clubs are in agreement is there any reason the league would reject it?

  6. #105
    Seasoned Pro
    Joined
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    2,573
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    707
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    633
    Thanked in
    408 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Student View Post
    How can it be concurrently rationalised that B teams affect the sporting integrity of the LOI but not the LSL?

    Interesting that the clubs want four rounds of fixtures as opposed to three. If the clubs are in agreement is there any reason the league would reject it?
    Because clubs in the LSL have no higher level to aspire to. Clubs in the LOI First Division do.

  7. #106
    International Prospect sbgawa's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    6,212
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    194
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    858
    Thanked in
    644 Posts
    4 rounds of games is 36 games before 4 playoff games and cups.
    The genius behind this statement wants 10 rounds of midweek fixtures for part time players.

  8. #107
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    38,196
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,689
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,912
    Thanked in
    3,213 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by EatYerGreens View Post
    Because clubs in the LSL have no higher level to aspire to. Clubs in the LOI First Division do.
    I suppose it's more technically accurate to say that LSL clubs don't aspire to any higher standard, whereas First Division clubs do.

    LSL clubs can step up to the First Division, but don't want to.

  9. #108
    International Prospect Ezeikial's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,072
    Thanked in
    663 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Student View Post
    How can it be concurrently rationalised that B teams affect the sporting integrity of the LOI but not the LSL?
    The statement addressed the sporting integrity issue only in relation to the League of Ireland.

  10. #109
    Coach Poor Student's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    8,042
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    239
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    110
    Thanked in
    70 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ezeikial View Post
    The statement addressed the sporting integrity issue only in relation to the League of Ireland.
    I appreciate that, just thought it was a tad contradictory.

  11. #110
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    38,196
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,689
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,912
    Thanked in
    3,213 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sbgawa View Post
    4 rounds of games is 36 games before 4 playoff games and cups.
    The genius behind this statement wants 10 rounds of midweek fixtures for part time players.
    It's only 32 games with 9 teams (albeit over the same number of matchdays)

    The alternative is a 24-game season, which is daft.

    My reading of the statement is that this be a one-off four-round FD to avoid dropping to 24 games, and if Limerick came back in 2021, 27 games would still be preferred. Could be wrong in that obviously

  12. #111
    International Prospect sbgawa's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    6,212
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    194
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    858
    Thanked in
    644 Posts
    Sorry u are right 32 games but with 1 team idle every week it still means lots of midweek games.
    I've yet to see one decent reason bar begrudgery to prevent rovers or any other team entering b teams just like in other European leagues.

  13. #112
    International Prospect Martinho II's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Killashee Longford
    Posts
    9,382
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,616
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    630
    Thanked in
    536 Posts
    Fair play to the first division clubs for their stance but why did they not do this in 2014 season? I dont get this logic!
    Gary Cronin is he the right man to manage Longford Town?

  14. #113
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    38,196
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,689
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,912
    Thanked in
    3,213 Posts
    Presume it's one of two reasons - 1) Delaney is gone and people can (and will) give out more about things, or 2) they didn't like how things went the last time Rovers B were in the league for whatever reason, and have now decided that they don't want it to happen again.

  15. Thanks From:


  16. #114
    International Prospect sbgawa's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    6,212
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    194
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    858
    Thanked in
    644 Posts
    The biggest complainers about it are Cabo limericks and athlone, if these clubs are setting the agenda for the league we are all in big trouble

  17. #115
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    38,196
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,689
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,912
    Thanked in
    3,213 Posts
    Do Limerick have a say?

    I could understand them being opposed to it in general obviously - the unfortunate question at the moment is, who would have that say?

  18. #116
    International Prospect sbgawa's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    6,212
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    194
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    858
    Thanked in
    644 Posts
    According to the journos pat o Sullivan was vocal at the fai AGM.

  19. #117
    International Prospect Nesta99's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,157
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,344
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,236
    Thanked in
    873 Posts
    So from a blanket ban on anyone speaking at AGMs to someone who represents a club that no longer exists speaking out against a team joining the league to replace them!?

  20. #118
    First Team Calcio Jack's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,342
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    149
    Thanked in
    101 Posts
    Not a surprise or any need for a complicated explanation , just the usual small minded peasant attitude and begrudery that has always existed towards Rovers from the Giles era and beyond.... comforting to know as we move into 2020 that we still can count on their consistent attempts to deflect from their own ineptitude and failure..... pity they don’t try to better themselves rather than trying to drag down their betters ..... bah humbug to the lot of them

  21. #119
    International Prospect Ezeikial's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,072
    Thanked in
    663 Posts
    It's refreshing to witness the attempts to understand the root cause of the unanimous objections by all nine first division clubs

  22. #120
    International Prospect sbgawa's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    6,212
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    194
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    858
    Thanked in
    644 Posts
    I'd question the unanimity considering Galway and drogs voted in favour at the nlec meeting.
    Looks like a majority decision to me that was presented as a united front. Fair enough that's the way it go's in these things.
    But if the lowest elements of the first division get to dictate policy we are looking at a levelling down.

Page 6 of 23 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Team of Shamrock Rovers Irish internationals
    By OwlsFan in forum Ireland
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 06/01/2007, 9:57 AM
  2. Where Are They Now? Shamrock Rovers Double Team 1986
    By el punter in forum Premier & First Divisions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 15/03/2006, 8:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •