I kinda think both are true. The fee was surprisingly low. That was in part reflected by the fact he had a year left on his deal. Saying that, given the number of teams allegedly interested in him, I certainly would have expected the fee to rise. Liverpool got the same initial fee for Danny Ward about 5 years ago who also had a year left on his deal.
Liverpool for example paid £35m (raising to £40m) for Alex Oxlade Chamberlain 8 years ago with 10 months left on his contract. Two summers ago, United paid £55m for Mount (rising to £60m) with a year left on his contract.
Honestly if you’d have asked me to guess the fee in advance, I’d have said probably £20-25m with either a sell on clause or another £5-10m in add ons. (There were rumours of Chelsea paying £40m which always felt very high).
Chelsea would probably by me, or any foot.ie poster for around £20 million !
Easy to forget he's only ever played 25 league games in his career. I think they done well to get that sort of fee for a still largely inexperienced goalkeeper given he had one year left on his contract and isn't exactly a kid anymore.
https://kesslereffect.bandcamp.com/album/kepler - New music. It's not that bad.
Shouldn't matter what the fee is anyway. It's how he plays in the coming season that matters. (I'm assuming he's going straight in as first choice of course)
Oh completely agree (within the bounds of acceptable hyperbole) - but don't want to be accused of jinxing things!
“World Cup qualification trump card.”
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/a...s/c5y6z613m49o
Bookmarks