That was in response to Ezekiel throwing in an unrelated thread derailing issue. No issue with any club partnering with any worthwhile charity .
If you say so but prior and now in this spat your perspective on some other fundraisers has been that of contempt. So claiming only a riposte to a single post that mirrors previously dismissive scorn is a stretch! You were selective also when responding to a jibe and ignoring the praise. So must have struck a nerve with you as you obviously did with myself as I simply dislike the dismissive tone of what is and should be seen as positive endeavour!
Other than the well thrashed out comments regarding your own club and Temple Street, I don`t recall being contemptuous of any fundraisers by any club ?Originally Posted by Nesta99
I think Bohs shirt sponsor is just an excuse to derail another foot.ie thread.
https://kesslereffect.bandcamp.com/album/kepler - New music. It's not that bad.
You'be changed your tune
Oops - so you changed back again!
You really are the perennial flip-flopper
Ok so! Why the contempt for any fundraiser by any club at all?
Waterford announced yesterday they will be wearing a kit with a message supporting the campaign for full time cardiac emergency care at Waterford university hospital. Jerseys to be unveiled during the week.
Did they announce during the week that they had a new sponsor?
Gary Cronin is he the right man to manage Longford Town?
No. Lee Power released a statement yesterday saying they did have offers of shirt sponsorship which were less than they got last year from Spin casino. He put that down to loss of European football. They decided to go with promoting the cardiac care campaign message instead. Some fans actually suggested to do this on Facebook a while back.
Has Dalymountrower approved this?
Fair play to Waterford and Bohs for standing up for what's right and being positive forces in their communities.
No disrespect to bohs, but if Waterford have this on their jerseys, and forfeit a sponsor, do we all not have to look at ourselves and think
Waterford do have sponsor on the shirt albeit at the back of the shirt (Viking), obviously isn’t worth the same financially as the front of the shirt. But the 24/7 care on the front of the shirt is a brilliant gesture from club. Something that’s been received very well locally.
Last edited by sulywaterfordfc; 16/02/2020 at 7:57 AM.
I know in our first season in premier division in 2000/01 at the start that we had no sponsorship on the front or back of our home jersey. Believe that in Monaghan Utds last season in 2012 they were in same position as well.
Gary Cronin is he the right man to manage Longford Town?
Harps away shirt:
#NeverStopNotGivingUp
Is it really a case of Waterford forfeiting a sponsor though ? Is it not more a case that they couldn't get a main sponsor (or at least not one paying any decent money) so have rightly gone with this route instead, rather than leave their shirt blank ?
It was very noticeable that they were the only shirt without a sponsor in the photos from the league launch at Abbotstown.
Its probably smart business two ways.
If they allowed a front of jersey sponsorship for small money it devalues every other layer of sponsorship , rear of jersey, sleeves , hoardings etc etc.
By going with a charity option this year it might mean next year they get a sponsorship that makes financial sense and better on a multi year basis.
In the meantime they get the kudos for supporting the community which might encourage more people to buy into the club.
Absolutely gorgeous
https://twitter.com/CorkCityFC/statu...381327872?s=19
Shirt is nice, but the 'iconic partnership' thing is fairly cringy.
Posting Permissions
Quote
Bookmarks