https://kesslereffect.bandcamp.com/album/kepler - New music. It's not that bad.
Yellow cork kit is decent I have to say. Like their black and white training gear too
Are 3rd kits still a thing for most clubs. We, Sligo Rovers, haven't done one for a few years now.
Manager: Fergal, have you your boots with ya?
Fergal: Ya, I have them here.
Manager: Ah good stuff, well give them to this man so, he forgot his!
You'd think that alright. But I have to say that they're so prevalent in football now that shirts look a bit weird or incomplete without them.
It only really struck me when looking at that photo from the league media launch last week. Waterford's shirt was the only one without a sponsor, and it made it look a bit shi'te and amateur compared to all the others.
https://kesslereffect.bandcamp.com/album/kepler - New music. It's not that bad.
Bohs new kit is getting a lot of traction online.
Bohs channelling the vibe alright and getting international kit coverage for the second year in a row.
https://www.theguardian.com/football...r-new-away-kit
Hello, hello? What's going on? What's all this shouting, we'll have no trouble here!
- E Tattsyrup.
Would UEFA allow that kit in Europa League matches? It can be seen as a political statement, and considering UEFA's/FIFA's stance on political statements, I wouldn't be sure they approve.
Well they allowed a poppy symbol on England International jersies, a symbol that is used to discriminate against footballers and others who, in conscience can`t/won`t wear one.
Since when is " Refugees Welcome" a political statement? Amnesty International is a charity. UNICEF is a charity ,Gazprom is in an oligarcic monster, Azerbaijan is a political entity...all allowed by UEFA.
It'd be some laugh if it turned out they didn't have the rights to use the image on it.
#NeverStopNotGivingUp
Of course it's a political statement. It's a distinct message Amnesty International are trying to get across above and beyond their own core brand. It's a message a lot of people wouldn't necessarily agree with, or would have varying degrees of agreement on. It's completely separate to brand promotion, which is what your other examples are.
Azerbaijan is a brand? UNICEF, Poppy?
Anyway, If UEFA ban it. more publicity for a human rights message .
Trying to see the distinction between it and the anti racism political campaign promoted by eh... UEFA
I mean this in the least arsey, most sincere way possible, but because it's Bohs I struggle to see beyond how much of a good bit of publicity/PR spin it is for them once again. On balance though Amnesty is a great partnership to have to be fair to them, it'll be interesting to see how it plays out in light of the FIFA laws etc.
From a personal perspective, I've no issue with the message on the Bohs shirt but it is clearly a political statement.
another gimmick from the middle child of LOI football, desperate for attention..
Shamrock Rovers- Where trophies are won and envy is scarce
Bookmarks