Yes. Parrott started the game on the bench (which was to the utter surprise of the Swedes – they rated him so highly). Mind you, Conor Coventry was identified as our key player for the team’s functioning.
Have I said Parrott is better than Kulusevski? I think Parrott is better (technically) ability-wise – one aspect of his play. This does not equate to Parrott being the better player. Indeed, I questioned in my initial post yesterday whether he’ll longer-term get into the Spurs team and when asked (by you) if Parrott is potentially better than Kulusevski, I responded “not necessarily”. For the record, I thought Parrott was poor, borderline dreadful, from what I saw during his time with Millwall and commented in my initial poor that “his adjustment to senior football has been slow to say the very least”, commenting it is only recently, the past 4 to 6 weeks, that noises “suggest he has turned a corner”. Further commenting that “he really needs to kick on from here” is not excessively hyping him up. He has a long way to go to recover the standing he had when on the fringes on the Spurs team.
We can all read Wikipedia pages btw.
Bookmarks