Just to so we're all clear, Greece are ranked three places behind an atocious Kenny-led Ireland. In the past year, they've drawn at home to Lithuania, away to Malta at lost in Cyprus.
UEFA's coefficient, based on recent European results, ranks the Greek league as 20th in Europe, nine places behind Serbia and eleven behind Scotland. It's also rated below the leagues of Norway, Denmark and Czechia.
This sports analytics company ranked the Greek Super League behind the likes of the Belgian second tier in 2021:
https://twitter.com/AndyForrester1/s...08765396959239
This site lists the Greek league behind likes of the French second tier and the Norwegian league:
https://www.globalfootballrankings.com/
Greece chose ten players from their domestic league in their most recent squad.
So, please let's not pretend Greece are some kind of footballing behemoth that we can't possibly, as a footballing nation, hope to compete with.
Greece are a mediocre footballing nation with a poor national team that somehow managed to absolutely batter us on Friday. Indeed it's perhaps measure of Greece's inadequacies as a team that they didn't put the four or five goals past us that the superiority of their performance deserved.
As far as the suggestion that if a player has at one point in his career played in European competition this is a mark of great quality and of being better than one who hasn't, well, that's such an obviously flawed line of reasoning that it's difficult to know where to begin.
Would our players suddenly be better if, rather than playing in the PL or Championship, they moved to a European qualified team playing in, for example, Cyprus or Gibraltar?
Bookmarks