On the bit in bold, we were extremely pragmatic and balanced. He played Ogbene for that exact reason and there were many balls that were sent down the line and into the channels for Ogbene to challenge for. Which he did. Winning a lot of free-kicks, corners, throw-ins and relieving pressure on us. It was a job well done all round (except maybe some of the set-pieces themselves).
On the last bit. A draw keeps us alive and, in any event, it would be a fairly decent result (same level as us, away, heat, hostility). Would like to see the performance to try and get the 3 points, obviously, and have us set up to maximize the chances of that. It is one that i am positive he will be looking at as a good chance to take 3 points. Either way, I am sure he'll get the full campaign (potentially if we get into the playoffs too) and then the decision can be made on the whole which makes more sense than trying to write his obituary now.
There was no impact on our seedings - they were unchanged.
I'd guess it means 'must-win' in terms of qualification, not in terms of identifying consistent signs of progress.
And in that sense it's probably fair - if we are to have any chanceof qualifying considering our likely points haul against the combined French and Dutch, then the matches against Greece would be 6 points we 'must' collect.
For me, in terms of identifying signs of progress, it's more a question of whether it's a 'should-win'.
As in, when looking at both squads, is this a game we should be winning or not? Gibraltar home and away are obviously 'should-win' (or 'should-win-easily') matches. Greece (away in particular) I'm not so sure about.
On a few occasions under Kenny we've probably had some better results than what we 'should' have had, bud we've had a good few that are worse too.
We were robbed of some very big away wins down the years. Seville in 92 was maybe the worst, but the 70s and 80s had a few belters. Wembley in 91 was down to poor finishing to be fair - the English I spoke to after the game all said to a man we were such a superior team - imagine if that team qualified we could have done so well in Sweden.
On Kenny, I think he doesn’t deserve criticism for the French game. He set us up really well and we were unlucky to lose against the second best team in the world. If we play like that for the rest of the campaign we have a chance of qualifying directly.
Being honest I despised Martin O’Neill’s football, even taking into account that his results on paper were good given the quality of players at his disposal. At least, we try to play football and given the talent coming through, that’s very welcome. He made out we couldn’t play ball, when teams like the North at least tried to. It was embarrassing to see minnows coming to Lansdowne Road and having the lions share of possession.
The players seem to like Kenny. Personally, I think he is awful with the media and I struggle to see any level of charisma there, but he must have something about him, because the players are giving their all.
I hope he’s a success but I feel he may fall between the cracks before we have a very decent team in about two years. He will have got a few campaigns so he can’t have any great complaints. A World Cup in Europe is exceptionally hard to qualify from (easier at least for the next one) but UEFA do give a few back doors to teams like us for the Euros. His legacy will be getting us back believing we should play football again and I’d be very happy if he stayed involved with player development. As I said, I hope he’s a great success and leads us to a few tournaments and does a great job, but that’s a gut feeling.
Some people seem to have a very simplistic mindset that if we don't win every game the manager should be sacked.
Well, given that the win rate of the current manager is a record low 28%, I don't think those people - whoever they may be - reside on this forum.
Keane O'Shea Given Best Smallbone
I don't think it's as simple as "he has to win every game". Trapattoni took over in May 2008, and the football, while successful at times, was tough to watch - to say the least. The same applies to O'Neill's and McCarthy's reigns that followed. All three managers broadly followed the same gameplan of making us tough to score against while nicking the odd goal to win. It was almost 12 years since Trapattoni took over when Kenny was given the job (dear God!) and at the beginning of his reign, the fans understood that he needed time to wipe clean the tactics of the previous decade, and introduce new players and formations. That didn't happen straight away, and it was unpleasant at times, but the fanbase was still behind him because there was evidence of the changes that he was making in some of the play of the national side.
I believe that time he was afforded for those changes expired after the Armenia and Ukraine games last summer. The win against Scotland, and the performance away to Ukraine granted him an extension but the reactions of the crowd after the home games against Armenia and Norway tell their own story.
We have no god given right to win every game, no team does. However, the expectation was that, eventually, the team would be competitive against higher ranked opposition and win games against lower ranked teams. His record suggests that we are improving. His team doesn't lose by more than one goal, England apart, so we're always in with a chance of getting something right up until the very end - it took a world class save to deny us a point against France. But we lose by a goal a lot. And we've only really blown one decent team away under his reign. Despite the teams we're facing this year, the performance against France says we will be competitive. But so did the performances against Serbia and Portugal, which came right before we lost to Luxembourg and drew with Azerbaijan.
My own opinion is, and has been for a while, that he'll be manager at least until the end of this campaign. If we've qualified, or are in a play off, then he'll continue. If not, then his successor will reap the benefits of the players he's introduced.
So it's not as simple as "he has to win every game", it's more a case of "if he loses, then he's closer to the end of his time in charge"
The way people are going on, you'd swear that Kenny has had a good record as Ireland manager and anyone criticising his time in charge are some fringe lunatics. Not only is Kenny's win percentage so low, the calabre of teams we've played under him has been quite low. Of the 32 games, only 5 have been against top tier nations first teams and I'm including Serbia in that who some might question. He's picked up 2 points out of 15 against them.
Of the 9 wins we've had under Kenny. Only one was against a team at our level. The rest has been against teams below us and mostly way below us in whatever ranking system you like to use. Also, 5 of the 9 victories have been in friendlies. Given the opposition we've played, having lost 12 times in 32 games is really bad. These are some of the reasons why some want Kenny gone. It's not because our expectations are too high, it's not because we've got some grudge against Kenny, it's because he has completely under performed as Ireland manager. I actually can't think how it could have gone much worse.
So is it lunacy to want a better manager or maybe the lunatics are those who want Kenny to stay?
Hello, hello? What's going on? What's all this shouting, we'll have no trouble here!
- E Tattsyrup.
Steve Staunton gave debuts to Stephen Ireland, Kevin Doyle, Joey O'Brien, Shane Long, Anthony Stokes, Joey Lapira, Darron Gibson, Stephen Hunt, Paul McShane, Stephen Kelly, Daryl Murphy, Andy Keogh and a load more, he was building for World Cup 2010 but didn't get the chance. Were people giving him credit for the building the foundations for nearly qualifying for the World Cup and qualifying for the Euros in 2012?
So you did some research and found a list of players to make it look like Staunton deserved similar praise to Kenny for giving debuts.... but you left Joey Lapria in this list, obviously not knowing the context of that and that it was far from a positive for Stan.
Ya did in your hole!
Lighten up.
I've said before that Kenny and Staunton's reigns have been similar in a few ways. And both were far from great performers in front of the camera. If it was to end now, I think Kenny's time in charge will be remembered similarly to Staunton's. A few false dawn's but overall 2 poor managers who were out of their depth. Not their fault of course, should never have been appointed. That was down to Delaney.
Yeah in fairness my comment was a bit of a throwaway line that was bit exaggerated. As I've said previously I just sick of every game being a referendum on him but he has brought it on himself.
The match going fans and players are still overwhelming behind him based on the vibe last week so he will see out the campaign at least
I don't know how, to be honest. From "You'll never beat the Irish" to "You most probably will beat the Irish, unless you're San Marino or Gibralter". I think it's a dangerously insidiuous attitude that's seeped in.
Also, any mention of Joe Lapira is welcome. He was great.
Finally, people laughing about Potter and Rodgers....neither of them need money and I think Ireland as we are right now is a very interesting project. I read today that Potter wants some time off. He could end up being just the man. Just saying. If Ferguson continues on his trajectory I think plenty of managers could look at us and say "I fancy a go at that". Added bonus there's very little pressure due to the diabolical record of the previous manager.
On your 1st point about not knowing why the match going fans are still behind him, I would say that people forget how bad things were in the few years between Euro 2016 and Kenny taking over. It was horrible football where very weak teams were getting 65% possession against us in the Aviva. It seemed like we were just drifting with players like Ronan Curtis playing on a semi regular basis. Kennys tenure does coincide with the best generation of players coming through in quite a while so I think people are willing to give him more leeway than before so that these players can get up to speed with International football.
I agree that someone could look at it as a good project if Kenny was to get the sack eventually. I think the net should be cast far and wide to see what replacements would be available, but I also dont trust the FAI to not just pick the easy option of Allardyce, Tony Pulis, Roy Hodgeson or someother British has been. We dont have the money of the past to attract a Rogers or Potter, and with all the best will in the world of them saying its a project they might fancy the money would be so low that they would jump ship at the 1st hint of a club job becoming available.
Don't see people like Potter or Rodgers having any interest in the Irish job. Firstly, it takes quite a while to demonstrate that you're making significant progress (6 competitive wins on the trot could take a year rather than a month) and as well as that, I'm not sure how much international success (with a team in Ireland's league at least) is considered evidence that you can cut the mustard in the EPL (any more evidence that already exists about Potter and Rodgers).
potter will be the englands manager after euro 24.
He'd be England manager right now if he hadn't left Brighton
Bookmarks