I get what you're saying but I think you almost have to completely separate the two Mick eras. Mick 1.0 was a young up and coming manager, his Irish teams played good football compared to what had come before and a lot of what came afterwards.
Mick 2.0 was a grizzled veteran with a very different and much more conservative approach to the game. I was very disappointed with the way he set us up second time around. Granted he didn't have the same quality of players available to him but he really had changed as a manager in the time between when he left and when he came back, and not for the better. It was conservative almost beyond belief.
I'm very much on the fence in terms of Kenny, but I do appreciate what he's doing in terms of blooding the younger lads, I don't think it's a given that Mick or another manager would have done it to the same extent. My concern with Kenny remains his match day abilities - formation and in game changes - he seems slow to learn on both.
Bookmarks