Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 146

Thread: Presidential Election 2018

  1. #101
    International Prospect NeverFeltBetter's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Gouldavoher
    Posts
    5,175
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    259
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    812
    Thanked in
    581 Posts
    Doesn't seem to be doing his poll numbers any good. He came off very badly in the Pat Kenny debate attacking Higgins, who dealt with him rather well. I see Ni Riada is trying a dig at Higgins as well today, over this "jet to Belfast" thing. But none of it really sticks.

    Edit: On Casey, he's going on about Higgins' dogs again today, both on the cost of grooming and on their breed. The first point is completely immaterial - there's no way Higgins would be so stupid as to put that expense on the taxpayer, and he can spend his salary anyway he pleases - and the second is the weirdest bit of faux-nationalism I have seen in a while
    Last edited by NeverFeltBetter; 22/10/2018 at 4:37 PM.
    Author of Never Felt Better (History, Film Reviews).

  2. #102
    Seasoned Pro backstothewall's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,690
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    246
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    750
    Thanked in
    484 Posts
    Interesting to see Higgins and Ni Riada take time in the prime time debate to speak to each other as Gaelige long to make the point that they were the only 2 people on the stage who understood what each other were saying.

    I have a feeling that may have been working on that one on the training ground.

  3. #103
    Seasoned Pro backstothewall's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,690
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    246
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    750
    Thanked in
    484 Posts
    My big takeaway from this is that the constitution should be amended to abolish the right of councils to nominate candidates to the presidency.

    They have nominated 4 utter clowns. There are ones with more sense than Freeman eating grass and the other 3 are obviously making a fly on the wall tv show they can flog after it is all said and done.

  4. Thanks From:


  5. #104
    International Prospect NeverFeltBetter's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Gouldavoher
    Posts
    5,175
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    259
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    812
    Thanked in
    581 Posts
    You would never get a Dail to go for that though, since most of them came from councils.

    Its a strange way to nominate someone for head of state all the same, and its only worked as an avenue since 97. At least the people get the final say.

  6. #105
    International Prospect NeverFeltBetter's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Gouldavoher
    Posts
    5,175
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    259
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    812
    Thanked in
    581 Posts
    Even Gallagher's messages to children are annoying: https://www.rte.ie/news/presidential...en-of-ireland/

  7. #106
    Director dahamsta's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2001
    Location
    The Internet
    Posts
    13,975
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    481
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    805
    Thanked in
    500 Posts
    Remember when we had to vote on the ridiculous idea of abolishing the senate? It should have been the presidency.

  8. Thanks From:


  9. #107
    Seasoned Pro
    Joined
    May 2010
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    2,662
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,280
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,854
    Thanked in
    893 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by backstothewall View Post
    My big takeaway from this is that the constitution should be amended to abolish the right of councils to nominate candidates to the presidency..
    If push came to shove, there's a good chance the electorate would vote to retain the status quo since the alternative would be to leave nominations in the gift of the Oireachtas, and that would make a stitch-up between the main parties the norm.

    I suspect we'll see a tightening up of the process, after Bunty-whatever-her-real-name is made complete idiots out of Dublin City Council. There's a good chance that prospective candidates will be more soundly vetted, and that might include a vote of the council on each applicant's merits before invitations to speak are issued.

    At the end of the day don't forget that while they nominated four political pygmies, they did do their job in not nominating Gemma O'Doherty.
    Last edited by Eminence Grise; 25/10/2018 at 3:08 PM.
    Hello, hello? What's going on? What's all this shouting, we'll have no trouble here!
    - E Tattsyrup.

  10. #108
    Like the Fonz. Only a dog. Mr A's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2004
    Location
    In the gutter, but looking at the stars
    Posts
    11,479
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,729
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,309
    Thanked in
    1,522 Posts
    Bunty was probably the second best prospective candidate after MDH.
    #NeverStopNotGivingUp

  11. #109
    International Prospect NeverFeltBetter's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Gouldavoher
    Posts
    5,175
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    259
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    812
    Thanked in
    581 Posts
    I would say candidates applying through the council route should also be nominated with a sufficient quorum of voting councilors, since there was so many abstentions at times. I'd also love for there to be a set date for them all to vote, rather than the strung-out clownshow this years turned into, but I'm not sure how practical that would be to implement.

    Regards the Presidency, I'd love to see it beefed up with a proper veto power (where a sufficiently high legislative majority could over-rule it) and a reduced term length. It's the only position we have elected by the entirety of the electorate after all, it should have powers that reflects that. You can count the amount of notable Presidential incidents that involve actual powers on one hand.
    Author of Never Felt Better (History, Film Reviews).

  12. #110
    International Prospect NeverFeltBetter's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Gouldavoher
    Posts
    5,175
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    259
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    812
    Thanked in
    581 Posts
    Both exit polls have Higgins winning at a canter, with Casey a distant second and the rest in single digits. The Blasphemy ref will pass easily.

    Casey's late surge will generate a lot of talk, proof that notoriety is better than blandness in these kind of races. I note from social media that a lot of the anti-SSM/Love Both crowd rowed in behind him, though I don't even know if Casey identifies with those causes, he just annoyed left-leaning types. A real basket of deplorables situation.

    The less than brilliant turnout also shows that talk of voter engagement being boosted after the last few referendums might be a tad overblown.
    Author of Never Felt Better (History, Film Reviews).

  13. #111
    Seasoned Pro backstothewall's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,690
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    246
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    750
    Thanked in
    484 Posts
    Miggeldy will be going to bed tonight knowing he is on course to be declared the most popular politician in the history of the state tomorrow and will possibly be the first Irish man or woman in history to receive over a million votes.

    Casey will be a story for a day or 2. He goes nowhere in a STV election and he's smart enough to know it. I'd speculate that he wouldn't even have managed 3nd place if there had been multiple hypothetical seats available by the time eliminations and MDHs massive surplus had come into play.

    Casey will be chip wrappers by Wednesday. MDH goes into the history books.

  14. #112
    Coach tetsujin1979's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Dublin, originally from Limerick
    Posts
    22,240
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,103
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,992
    Thanked in
    3,286 Posts
    few commentators on twitter saying Casey's surge to 20% is a sign of the underlying racism in the country, and his demonising of travellers was the dogwhistle the right needed needed to hear* to get them out to vote

    *I know you can't hear dogwhistles, but you know what I mean
    All goals, yellow and red cards tweeted in real time on mastodon, BlueSky and facebook

  15. #113
    The Cheeto God Real ale Madrid's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    4,054
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    478
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,535
    Thanked in
    772 Posts
    I'd be a little worried. Casey was incoherent and disorganized, if he hit the message a week earlier and made it a 2 horse race before the main debates it could have been closer.

  16. #114
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    38,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,663
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,893
    Thanked in
    3,197 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tetsujin1979 View Post
    few commentators on twitter saying Casey's surge to 20% is a sign of the underlying racism in the country, and his demonising of travellers was the dogwhistle the right needed needed to hear* to get them out to vote

    *I know you can't hear dogwhistles, but you know what I mean
    I think that's harsh. Part of the issue was how PC things have become lately; you can't criticise anyone without being labelled racist. Casey made an entirely fair point on travellers - there is no reason for them to have special status in Ireland - but instead of opening a debate on the matter, you had Varadkar simply telling him to shut up and Freeman coming out demanding an apology (the go-to "argument" of the current decade) and saying that travellers' problems were society's fault, which is utterly daft. It was to an extent of a corollary point he made about Ireland being over-the-top in terms of welfare (a point a recent Government report kind of agrees with), although that didn't get as much traction on either side of the fence.

    Here's the original comments btw, for clarity. I think they're entirely valid. The case for the defence is that they've been fighting for rights to education (primarily) for decades; Casey said they have the right to free education (and don't take it up; is it 2% go through to Leaving Cert?). The argument was made that they were racially discriminated because entire villages shut down when there was a wedding or a funeral on; I don't know how accurate that is, but it doesn't explore why that might be the case (Casey touches on it in his reply, but I think dismisses the real reason - fist-fights and arrests - as too obvious).

    Yet rather than address these points, Varadkar tells him to shut up, and Freeman says they're all society's fault. I think that's sparked a good chunk of the vote.

    It's part of a broader issue there days where people park their kids in a car/police station for a day to assert their right to a free house, or get another few months to make a payment on a mortgage they haven't touched in years, or where people can rack up double- and treble-figure criminal conviction numbers and be given another chance because sure haven't they a young child - and any criticism of this is simply dismissed as some kind of bigotry or, as you've suggested, racism or a play to the masses, instead of a genuine point for debate.

    I think there's a growing frustration about all that, so a protest vote was always likely for whoever said it first. Not saying that's the sole reason for the relatively high Casey vote, but I think it is one which you haven't mentioned.

    (Disclaimer - I voted for Michael D, and I agree the travellers comments meant that the Casey campaign became one topic, while other stuff - his daft comments about Michael D's dogs - were overlooked)

  17. Thanks From:


  18. #115
    The Cheeto God Real ale Madrid's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    4,054
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    478
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,535
    Thanked in
    772 Posts
    His comments were valid? Nonsense. It's not PC to label racists as racist.
    Last edited by Real ale Madrid; 27/10/2018 at 10:23 AM.

  19. #116
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    38,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,663
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,893
    Thanked in
    3,197 Posts
    Have you got any sort of argument to go along with that?

    I've given a detailed one on my side. Dismissing that as "nonsense" is exactly why Casey got so many votes

  20. Thanks From:


  21. #117
    The Cheeto God Real ale Madrid's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    4,054
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    478
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,535
    Thanked in
    772 Posts
    You've given no argument why his comments were valid. None. If you can tell me why Travellers don't deserve recognition of thier ethnicity then I'll be happy to debate it. Everything else follows on from that.

  22. #118
    Biased against YOUR club pineapple stu's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In the long grass
    Posts
    38,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,663
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,893
    Thanked in
    3,197 Posts
    Why should they get special treatment? Casey made the point that there's more Polish people in Ireland than travellers, but the Polish aren't an ethnic group. They instead have adjusted to our culture, were treated equally, and as a result integrated.

    So why shouldn't travellers also be treated equally? Why should we discriminate in favour of them? Having a special status for travellers discourages any sort of societal integration. It entrenches "traveller culture", which has negative issues such as domestic abuse, animal abuse, crime, event policing, undereducation, environmental damage, tax evasion - all at the expense, financially and otherwise, or greater society. By Varadkar telling Casey to "shut up", by Freeman saying that these issues are somehow our fault, by you saying that it's somehow racist to even bring this up, then we create a groupthink environment where these issues simply can't be discussed. That's the frustration that has led to Casey going from 2% to 21% in a fortnight.

    I've already covered the counter-arguments put on the interview - the fighting for educational rights (which they have), the "racism" around villages shutting down at weddings/funerals (obvious issues there), and there was really little enough else to be honest.

    Why should we enshrine a culture which is a drain on society in many ways? The argument could be put that I'm only focussing on the negatives - but of course I am. You could say the points are generalisations - but of course they are. That's kind of the point. There are nice people in the traveller community - but it's the negatives that have to be addressed, as is always the case. And the negatives are more prominent than in other population groups. And unless we can talk about the negatives without being shut down with no counter-argument - as you've tried to do - then we can never improve things.
    Last edited by pineapple stu; 27/10/2018 at 10:57 AM.

  23. #119
    The Cheeto God Real ale Madrid's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    4,054
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    478
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,535
    Thanked in
    772 Posts
    Comparing Travellers to the Polish isn't relevant. We are discussing ethnicity not nationality. Your whole first paragraph is irrelevant. Casey attacking thier ethnicity is attacking the bad and good travellers. Thier ethnicity recognises that they have been victims of racism aind discrimination and is a vital stepping stone to address this within society. It has been fought over for decades by numerous groups from within the travelling community , from human rights organisations from within Ireland and from rights organisations internationally. It is the basis for all Casey's comments. For you to dismiss them as a drain on society is quite frankly astonishing. The factors you cite are prevalent in all downtrodden communities all over the world be they settled or traveller alike.

    Casey then doubled down by focusing on a specific set of travellers that turned down social housing while ignoring the rest of the population that turn down social housing. That in itself is discrimination and it's not PC for people to see through that rubbish.

    There is no doubt that there is a huge anti social and behavioral problem within the travelling community, massive, no one is or should be denying that.

  24. #120
    The Cheeto God Real ale Madrid's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    4,054
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    478
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,535
    Thanked in
    772 Posts
    To reiterate. Peter Casey doesn't understand why Travellers were given ethnic minority. He has no idea why it was done and has absolutely no understanding of what it means.

    "Sure they are not Romany or whatever"

    "My Pakistani taxi driver couldn't understand the question"

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 2016 US presidential election
    By osarusan in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 01/02/2017, 12:28 AM
  2. US Presidential Election 2012
    By culloty82 in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07/11/2012, 12:55 PM
  3. 2011 Presidential Election
    By culloty82 in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 468
    Last Post: 28/09/2011, 3:24 PM
  4. 2011 Presidential Election
    By Hurt Locker in forum Rubbish
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08/06/2011, 9:35 PM
  5. fantasy presidential election....
    By Quack in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10/09/2004, 10:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •