I don't think so. If it was promoted in that way, it shouldn't have been. Some stuff will never be clear, or clear enough.
We are not talking about stuff like the ball being over the line or not, we are talking about subjective decisions. I don't know how the VAR panel reach a decision as to whether to ask the ref to review an incident or not, but I think it should be more transparent (and just improved too).
I also thought the Nigeria penalty was soft, but I could see why the ref made the decision he did. I don't think that VAR should be used for stuff like that to be honest. It should be used for the more blatant errors - the ones where there is no doubt that the ref just got it wrong.
I think VAR would be better promoted as a way to correct the worst decisions (offsides, blatant dives, off-the-ball incidents, and so on), rather than something that will get every decision right, which it won't ever be.
Last night there was another claim for a penalty after an Argentinean defender mis-headed the ball onto his own arm late in the game. I couldn't believe that the panel asked the ref to review it, and was very pleased to see that he watched it and decided it was not a penalty. Was that a clear an obvious error? I certainly didn't think so, and was shocked to see a panel, who are apparently working off such a criterion, ask the ref to review.
But then again, maybe the ref himself asked to view the footage, and there was no implication that he had made an error.
Bookmarks