Where does it end? It ends when you're booing for reasons other than football reasons. Booing a guy because he plays for a club that has a rivalry with another club that is associated with Ireland in general. Again, I think you're being pedantic here in that you're condoning such behaviour on the basis that it's a human right - although you don't partake in it - but ignoring overwhelming evidence, e.g. mindless booing of players such as Lovenkrans - he was booed when he eventually came on - who have absolutely nothing to do with Cromwell, occupation, Irish emigration and thus feeding into and supporting what is a miserable, grotty dispute between two sets of bigots in Glasgow who are hundreds of miles and years removed from Northern Ireland.Originally Posted by Cowboy
Far worse behaviour than booing goes on but is that a defence of booing a Rangers player? You'll have to do better than that, mate. I played football for years and have gone to football matches for years - I'm not just pontificating but I hate seeing things that bring down the tone of a game of ball. Am I out of order/a "self-appointed moral guardian"/PC peddler just for saying that some level of common deceny should apply to it? If a player dives like Pires, boo away and I'll do it with you. If a player is cheating, fine. If a ref makes a terrible decision, booing is completely within order. Booing some random punter from Dennmark or Croatia or Macedonia or Scotland because he has the nerve to play for a successful club is out of order.
Did elements of the Windsor Park support have the right to chant "UVF Trick or Treat," boo Alan Kernaghan or make monkey noises whenever Terry Phelan or Paul McGrath touched the ball? The trick or treat and monkey noises are far worse than what we're talking about but the booing of Kernaghan? That's the exact same thing. Did they have the right?
Bookmarks