If we don't beat Poland or Scotland at home then we don't deserve to play in Euro 2016. It's as simple as that. We can moan about having such a difficult group (God knows I have) but at the end of the day if Slovakia are the only team of any caliber that you have managed to beat in a competitive situation over the course of 15 years then you are just taking up oxygen at a tournament.
Watching this team the last while, I just don't get the impression we have a team that believes they can win against good teams. Part of that is down to Trapattoni's tactics and put downs of the ability of his own players draining confidence. In fairness, before him, we lost points we should have taken under Kerr because of his negativity and stupid substitutions.
Ironically, some of the more stellar performances and results over the years have come under Staunton (Germany (Q), Slovakia (Q), Czech Republic (Q), Wales (Q), Sweden, Denmark).
I think people exaggerate how good Trapattoni was and how bad Staunton was. People go on about Cyprus but Kazakhstan was every bit as bad as that and Trapattoni wasn't working with a patchwork of players. He was working with a settled group of players.
Also, Trapattoni had the element of luck that Staunton didn't have numerous times against Czechs and Slovakia; and there was no shame in the goal we conceded to Germany.
Going on a tangent here but I think Staunton is worthy of a bit of revision.
Jonathan Douglas only said in The Sunday Times last week that he should have been given another campaign. I'm not saying I agree with it BTW.
Bookmarks